Showing posts with label Collin Wilcox Paxton. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Collin Wilcox Paxton. Show all posts

Wednesday, December 1, 2021

THE BABY MAKER (1970)

Title: THE BABY MAKER

Year of Release: 1970

Director: James Bridges

Genre: Drama

Synopsis: A couple unable to conceive a child enlist seek a surrogate to give birth to their child, locating a suitable young woman for this, the husband subsequently impregnating her.

Within a film history context: Infertility in male, and female characters has been presented several times in cinema before THE BABY MAKER. One of the first examples was William Keighley's DR. MONICA (1934). An infertile obstetrician discovers that her friend's baby, which she is set to deliver, is actually fathered by her husband. This causes waves between the women, with both willing to make sacrifices on account of their future happiness, and for the baby. JOURNEY FOR MARGARET (1942), directed by W. S. Van Dyke, was set during World War II. An American and his wife in London are affected by the war, the pregnant wife injured during The Blitz, and losing their baby as a result. The husband visits an orphanage and becomes enamored of two children, whom he wishes to adopt for him and his wife, but certain obstacles make themselves apparent in this touching movie. In a similar vein, Henry Koster's MY BLUE HEAVEN (1950), centered around a showbusiness couple, with the wife losing her baby, and unable to conceive again. She and her husband determine to adopt a child, all the while maintaining their television series appearances. Another drama about a couple unable to have a child was CLOSE TO MY HEART (1951), directed by William Keighley. A couple who cannot have one of their own begin enquiries about adopting a child, but run into hurdles based upon its parentage, of which the husband is most concerned. Matters were equally somber in Rudolph Mate's PAULA (1952). After suffering her second miscarriage, and consumed by the fact she cannot have other children, a tormented woman injures a child at night, leaving him unattended. Guilt overcoming her, she volunteers at the hospital to assist the child, who is an orphan. The woman and child bond, but the events of that fateful night may come back to haunt her in this compelling movie.

Things were not as innocent in THE BIGAMIST (1953), directed by Ida Lupino. A woman's infertility, and how she and her husband wish to adopt a baby, are the starting points of the story. An adoption agent's investigation of the couple unearths certain truths about the husband, and his two wives, which makes up the content of this film. In the next example, comedy was at the fore of Gene Kelly's THE TUNNEL OF LOVE (1958). A couple unable to conceive a child visit an adoption agency to initiate the process, and come against many hurdles and misunderstandings, both serious and comic, in their quest. Into the 1960s, John Rich's THE NEW INTERNS (1964) was a multi-character drama set in a hospital, following the lives and loves of its staff members. Infertility is a subject in this movie, with a doctor finding out he cannot have children, the movie detailing the consequences of this for him. In utter contrast, Mike Nichols' raucous WHO'S AFRAID OF VIRGINIA WOOLF? (1966), had a couple unable to conceive a baby concoct the presence of an imaginary child to hide their pain and disappointment at their predicament. One of the most pungent, honest examinations of marriage, it was a credit to all participants, with Richard Burton and Elizabeth Taylor in the lead roles as the tortured couple. THE BABY MAKER had several elements in common with earlier films in the genre, but stood out from these for other reasons.

The movie was similar in structure to the many films where a married couple seek the services of an agency to adopt a child, such as MY BLUE HEAVEN, CLOSE TO MY HEART, and THE TUNNEL OF LOVE. Either the wife, or both parties cannot conceive a child for one reason or another, as with the wife in THE BABY MAKER. Putting on a unified front, they go through the process of adoption, with the many examples such as in the pre-mentioned films charting the roadblocks the couple may encounter in reaching their aim. Where THE BABY MAKER changes course from other samples is that the couple do not deal with an agency which is cold and bureaucratic. Their advocate is a mature, understanding lady who seeks to make the process as seamless as possible. As the couple appears to have not done anything to sabotage their adoption desires, the sometimes melodramatic obstacles of other films, placed in the way of the adoption are not present in THE BABY MAKER. Instead, the movie lays bare the many issues the couple face having the surrogate in their home, and part of their lives for nine months. There is enough material here without other stumbling blocks being placed in their way, which gives the movie a more naturalistic, adult feel. Another aspect of THE BABY MAKER is also refreshing for its treatment.

In movies such as CLOSE TO MY HEART, where the identity of the adoptee's biological parents was placed under the microscope, causing issues for those wishing to adopt the child, matters in THE BABY MAKER take another direction. Aside from the fact that THE BABY MAKER deals with Tish, a surrogate being impregnated by a sterile woman, Suzanne's husband Jay, both the couple, and the audience, find out exactly who the surrogate mother is in the movie. Tish is not a shadowy figure in any respect, but a flesh and blood presence whose intimate thoughts, and life, are put on display for the spectator. This also provides the movie with both layers of obvious, and less evident emotional undercurrents that the other movies could never explore. This was mainly due to the fact that biological parents were either deceased, or never shown, in movies such as JOURNEY FOR MARGARET, and PAULA. Aside from this, the effect of Tish's surrogate pregnancy is also explored in secondary characters such as Tish's boyfriend Tad, and how he handles her situation. 

Tad's quizzical reaction gives THE BABY MAKER a point of difference, moving away from the viewpoints of just the central trio of Jay, Suzanne, and Tish. A further interesting counterpoint can be found in Tish's friend Charlotte, and how she envisions Jay. There is the perception, mainly comical, that he is too dry and middle-class, but passable as a person. This fills out another perspective on how Jay is envisioned, who, apart from Tish, is also a 'baby maker', thereby assisting the audience to see him in another light. A perceptive movie with many memorable scenes, THE BABY MAKER is not only an absorbing motion picture but also, makes viewers see the issue of infertility from all sides of the equation.

Overview: James Bridges was the director of eight motion pictures over a period of eighteen years. Generally dealing in dramatic themes with a nod to issues of the times, his movies deftly combined social awareness with stimulating entertainment values. Mr Bridges' second film, THE PAPER CHASE (1973) was about a young law student, and the ups and downs of his academic life. In particular it followed his relationship with his professor, and the blossoming romance between him, and the professor's daughter. SEPTEMBER 30, 1955 (1977) detailed the events in a life of a young man who was a fan of James Dean, and both his, and the reactions of his friends, to the actor's death. Next came one of James Bridges' most famous movies, THE CHINA SYNDROME (1979). A tense exploration of events at a nuclear plant, and the cover up about certain safety procedures, it was a box-office success that also enjoyed considerable critical praise. 

Mr Bridges' fifth film, URBAN COWBOY (1980), was a change of pace for the director. A character study of a young man and woman, with western and country music overtones, it nevertheless made money, and was an interesting addition to the director's oeuvre. Unfortunately, James Bridges' next movie, MIKE'S MURDER (1984) was not as notable. The story of a woman investigating the death of her lover, discovering things she never knew about him, was not a financial success for its studio. James Bridges' penultimate film, PERFECT (1985) also did not perform as well as expected at the box office. The story of a reporter composing a piece on fitness clubs, then becoming involved with an aerobics instructor, did not resonate with the public and lost money, critical opinion anything but friendly. The final film of James Bridges, BRIGHT LIGHTS, BIG CITY (1988) was a drama about a young writer in New York City, especially concerned with his drug addiction, and emotional issues. As with his previous two movies, it was not a money-maker, and received with mixed critiques. THE BABY MAKER, being James Bridges' first motion picture, was one of his better projects, and an insightful film.

James Bridges has crafted a movie that approaches the delicate subjects of surrogacy, and infertility, with a humanistic, sympathetic slant. Mr Bridges ensures that the audience comprehends the feelings of all parties involved in this exchange, which is one of the best features of the film. THE BABY MAKER makes crystal clear exactly what married couple Suzanne and Jay are seeking to make their lives complete, which is a child, and how Tish is the one who can assist them with this. The narrative is nicely-paced, and fluidly moves from one situation to another with ease and precision. One feels as they are being afforded an intimate glimpse into the lives of these characters, with a level of depth that makes them three-dimensional. While a dramatic film at heart, THE BABY MAKER is not all gloom and doom, which gives it an easy watchability. There are some lightly humorous sequences which meld well with the more serious stretches, but these are not antic-based in nature. Everything is pertinent to the characters, and where they are in their journey. Some of the information relating to pregnancy and surrogacy, though, may be dated in retrospect, but this is irrelevant overall - the intention is to inform the audience, which is an achievement that should not be underestimated. THE BABY MAKER does have a number of positive facets such as those mentioned, but there are some aspects which needed further work.

It is admirable that THE BABY MAKER dives into the story, immediately letting audiences know of the movie's burning issue, but the lack of a prologue from the characters is a little jarring. Scenes which could have established Tish's thoughts on surrogacy, and Suzanne and Jay's likewise on their situation, would have added immeasurably to a sense of smoothness in the beginning of the film. On the other hand, there are some scenes which could have been shortened, as they do not do much for the film. The sequence where Tish is in the nightclub with the music blaring, and psychedelic images popping on the screen is something which skillfully reflects late 1960s/early 1970s culture, but the imagery in this segment is a little too much. Similarly, the protest scene feels as if it has just been added in for social relevance purposes, but it is also extraneous. The only real meaning to be gleaned from this was that it showed Jay was not as cool emotionally as first thought, as he jumps to Charlotte, and the crowd's, defense.

THE BABY MAKER, in all, works best when it explores those little moments of keen character interaction. Scenes such as Tish's visit to her mother and grandmother in the trailer, and Tish trying to make Jay breakfast, but not succeeding, are all excellent. They give the audience character information to savor, and relish for its honesty. These particular sequences have a sense of emotional veracity which give the characters added dimension, and are surprising in, and of themselves. In summing up, there are some things which can be said about THE BABY MAKER as a movie. Although the film does have its lapses, overall, THE BABY MAKER is an engaging motion picture that deals with a difficult topic in a truthful, forthright manner.

Acting: Acting in THE BABY MAKER is of a high standard, with several earnest performances standing out. In the lead role of Tish, Barbara Hershey contributes another complex character to her cinematic credits. What could have been a one-dimensional hippie girl is made into a flesh and blood person in THE BABY MAKER, whose innermost emotions and thoughts have been laid bare to the audience by Miss Hershey. Collin Wilcox Paxton, as Suzanne, the woman wanting a child, but unable to conceive, makes her feelings of inadequacy, and sadness, transparent to the audience without overt shows of emotion. Her quiet reactions to situations, such as Jay's growing connection to Tish, makes them all the more heartrending. As Suzanne's husband Jay, Sam Groom is an actor whose polished presence in the movie gives it another layer of intricacy. While in the beginning it appears Jay is uncomfortable with his part in the conception of his child with another woman, Mr Groom's facial expressions, and eyes, say this without any dialogue, his subtle personality slowly weaving its way into the movie. Jay is a low-key character with a warmth that wins over not only Tish, but the audience as well. There are three other performers who make also their mark in THE BABY MAKER.

As Tad Jacks, Tish's boyfriend, Scott Glenn is another multi-faceted protagonist, and a polar opposite to Jay. Where Jay is reserved and gentlemanly, Tad is working class, and brusque. There are also telling contrasts between the sexuality of THE BABY MAKER's male characters which are of note. Jay is only depicted shirtless within the confines of his marriage, and with Tish at the swimming pool; a 'safe' masculinity. On the other hand, Tad is shirtless for much of the movie, and naked in some scenes. There is the concept posited that Tad's 'dangerous' masculinity is not within the parameters of suburban morality, and Scott Glenn plays this for all it is worth in the movie. As Mrs Culnick, who brings Tish into the lives of Jay and Suzanne, Lili Valenty is authoritative as the initiator of the couple's surrogacy agreement, her diplomatic manner adding a touch of class, and Europe, to the movie. The final performance of note is by Phyllis Coates as Tish's mother. Despite being featured in only a handful of scenes, Miss Coates makes her presence felt as Tish's knowing, humorous mother.

Soundtrack: THE BABY MAKER does not have a soundtrack laden with tunes, which works to give the scenes, especially the intimate conversations between characters, appropriate space. The most notable piece is Fred Carlin's 'People Come People Go' which, as with many 1970s movies, is played at both the beginning, and end of the film. It gives the movie a bittersweet, melancholy feel when taking into account what has occurred between both points of time in the film.

Mise-en-scene: THE BABY MAKER is beautifully photographed courtesy of cinematographer Charles Rosher Jr., who makes the pretty California locales appear picturesque without disintegrating into a travelogue. There are scenes at the beach and at the theme park which are not too bright, but thankfully blend into the movie as a whole. Regarding Raymond Paul's set design, he makes clear effective contrasts between Tad and Tish's scruffy artist's den, and Jay and Suzanne's lush home, with its modern appliances and furnishings. Aside from set design, costuming has also been well utilized to make certain points about characters in THE BABY MAKER. The economic, and social differences between both couples are also evident in their apparel. Jay and Suzanne's costuming is refined and classic, while Tad and Tish's is of the early 1970s, more laidback and funky, with mini dresses and long hair for both sexes the order of the day.

Notable Acting Performances: Barbara Hershey, Collin Wilcox Paxton, Sam Groom, Scott Glenn, Lili Valenty, Phyllis Coates.

Suitability for young viewers: No. Infrequent coarse language, male nudity, female nudity, adult themes.

Overall Grade: B

LinkIMDB Page

Movie Excerpt



Tuesday, September 1, 2020

TO KILL A MOCKINGBIRD (1962)


Title: TO KILL A MOCKINGBIRD

Year of Release: 1962

Director: Robert Mulligan

Genre: Drama

Synopsis: A lawyer in 1930s Alabama takes on the case of a black man accused of raping a white woman.

Within a film history context: Movies which have a lawyer protagonist have been present in cinema for many years since the silent screen. One of the first documented films was Allan Dwan's THE COUNTY CHAIRMAN (1914). In this, a tug of war between two men occurs, one of them being a lawyer, with past incidents such as business and romantic rivalries rearing their head. More domestic in its outlook was ALWAYS IN THE WAY (1915). Starring Mary Miles Minter, it  was concerned with a young girl neglected by her father, a lawyer, who remarries after the death of his wife, the stepmother viewing the stepdaughter as an unnecessary obstacle. Frank Lloyd's A TALE OF TWO CITIES (1917) set in 1790s France, showed how a lawyer saved an aristocrat, who, incidentally, was married to his great love. In a similar vein to ALWAYS IN THE WAY, HOUSE OF CARDS (1917), directed by Alice Guy, revolved around a young protagonist. A young girl is feeling abandoned emotionally by her parents, her father being a lawyer, and runs away with a young man. Moralistic in nature was Harry Revier's THE GRAIN OF DUST (1918). Here an innocent young woman is loved by a young lawyer who schemes to get closer to her, but his machinations cause her torment. As with the 1910s, the 1920s silent era was also a time of varied depictions of lawyers in cinema.

CAUSE FOR DIVORCE (1923), directed by Hugh Dierker, was about romantic entanglements in a family. The daughter of a man, married to a lawyer, falls for a smooth man who is up to no good. Somewhat more comic in its intentions was Robert Leonard's CHEAPER TO MARRY (1925). This film focused on two lawyers in a firm, and how one partner tries to convince the other to stay away from his mistress so that he can have her instead. A darker view of lawyers could be found in SUPER SPEED (1925), directed by Albert Rogell. This time around, the lawyer is trying to take advantage of someone else's invention, but, the protagonist will not allow him to do so. Inventive in its naughtiness was E. Mason Hooper's GETTING GERTIE'S GARTER (1927). Again, the indiscretions of a lawyer's private life are in view, with a garter causing untold anguish for him, with comic results. Signs of the changing times were explored in DON'T MARRY (1928), a comedy helmed by James Tinling. In this film, a liberated flapper has her eye on a young lawyer, who has antiquated views of women, and disguises herself as another woman, with the intention of making him realize modern women are better than Victorian women. As evidenced by the above films, the majority were comic in nature, but still said much to audiences of the time.

The 1930s featured a plethora of lawyer-themed films. D.W. Griffith's ABRAHAM LINCOLN (1930), was a biographical account of the American president, statesman and lawyer. THE NAUGHTY FLIRT (1930), directed by Edward F. Cline, was a comedy of a young woman who has a thing for a handsome lawyer. More dramatic was Frank Lloyd's THE RIGHT OF WAY (1931). Starring Conrad Nagel as an uppity lawyer whose life takes an unexpected turn, suspected of something he did not do, events conspire for him to face his trespasses and correct these. A more sympathetic view of lawyers can be found in THREE WHO LOVED (1931), directed by George Archainbaud. In this film, a committed young man studying to be a lawyer finds himself in both romantic, and legal trouble. More domestic in inclination was Clarence Brown's A FREE SOUL (1931). With Norma Shearer in the lead role, it focused on a lawyer whose daughter falls for his gambler client. Matters were of an entirely different nature in DRIFTING SOULS (1932), directed by Louis King. Here, a female lawyer provided the drama, with a young woman seeking to fund her father's medical operation, and becoming involved with an assortment of shady characters. Things were more heated in Richard Thorpe's CROSS-EXAMINATION (1932), with H.B. Warner as an attorney seeking the truth about a boy charged with patricide. 1932's LAWYER MAN, directed by William Dieterle, followed the private life of a lawyer, his professional career, and romantic escapades. Marital infidelity was given a workout in William Wyler's COUNCELLOR AT LAW (1933), with John Barrymore as a lawyer cuckolded by wife Doris Kenyon. This is just a small sample of the many films with lawyers in the lead role in the 1930s, a decade which seemed to feature innumerable lawyer protagonists.

In the 1940s, many star vehicles, as in the other decades, were developed to showcase the lawyer theme for audiences. 1940's REMEMBER THE NIGHT, directed by Mitchell Leisen, starred Fred McMurray and Barbara Stanwyck in one of their teamings as a lawyer and his shoplifter client, and the love that develops between them. Nick Grinde's CONVICTED WOMAN (1940) had a female lawyer defending a woman against the charge of theft, with many unexpected twists and turns. TEXAS TERRORS (1940), directed by George Sherman, was slightly different from prior lawyer films. In this movie, which had a western theme, a lawyer seeks retaliation on the person who caused the death of his parents. Films about real-life lawyers appeared rarely on screen, with Frank Borzage's THE VANISHING VIRGINIAN (1942) the exception. This films followed the life of Robert Yancey, a Virginian district attorney, and was a change of pace for the genre. For A STRANGER IN TOWN (1943), directed by Roy Rowland, matters were of a different nature. With this film, an attorney battles corrupt people seeking to become mayor, but finding assistance from an unlikely source. D. Ross Lederman's DANGEROUS BUSINESS (1946) was a drama with comic asides. A male and a female lawyer create a partnership, and take on the case of a man who believes he has been framed for an act he did not commit. Things took a comical turn with CROSS MY HEART (1946), directed by John Berry. With Betty Hutton in the lead role, it was about a woman who tries to elevate her husband's business reputation with a lie - about a crime she had no part in. Alfred Hitchcock's more serious THE PARADINE CASE (1947) showed how a married lawyer falls for the woman he is defending, and the fallout in his marriage. One of the best examples of lawyer films arrived at the end of the decade. ADAM'S RIB (1949), directed by George Cukor, was a sprightly showcase for Spencer Tracy and Katharine Hepburn as married lawyers on opposite sides of the legal fence, displaying their rivalry in all arenas for the audience to understand. 

The 1950s began with a more serious portrayal of lawyers than in the 1940s, in keeping in line with post-war pessimism in cinema. Anthony Mann's SIDE STREET (1950) was about a young man who becomes involved with a untoward lawyer, leading to harmful repercussions for him. In a much more light-hearted vein, THE BIG HANGOVER (1950), directed by Norman Krasna, has a law graduate trying his best to conceal his weakness; a reaction to the smell of alcohol. An underhanded lawyer, something previous films had investigated, was the focus of Henry Levin's TWO OF A KIND (1951). In this production, a lawyer machinates with another man to lay stake to the fortune of a wealthy man. In an alternate vein, finding one's strength is the crux of THE PEOPLE AGAINST O'HARA (1951), helmed by John Sturges. With Spencer Tracy in the lead, it followed an attorney returning to the legal fold to defend his neighbour's son. More heart-stopping was Don Siegel's COUNT THE HOURS! (1953). Here a lawyer takes on the case of two married ranch workers accused of murder, but they are innocent of the crime. DOUBLE JEOPARDY (1955), directed by R.G. Springsteen, was more action-oriented in flavour, but still had its dramatic moments. In this instance, a lawyer defends his amour's father, who is accused of killing a man who was blackmailing him. One of the most famous films with a legal theme was Alfred Hitchcock's WITNESS FOR THE PROSECUTION (1957). A man accused of murder is defended by his British lawyer, with many of the typical comic, and dramatic touches that were symbolic of Mr Hitchcock's filmmaking style. One of the most profitable courtroom dramas was ANATOMY OF A MURDER (1959), directed by Otto Preminger. With James Stewart in the pivotal role of lawyer Paul Biegler, it was about his defense of a man accused of killing the man who raped his wife, but matters were not as simple as first thought in this film. TO KILL A MOCKINGBIRD, while concerned with a lawyer and both his business, and personal lives, had the intricate storylines of many of the above examples, but diverted from previous films in certain areas.

TO KILL A MOCKINGBIRD, based upon the novel of the same name by Harper Lee, is a film that intimately depicts the family life of its protagonist, lawyer Atticus Finch, and the effect that his occupation has on his children, particularly his daughter Scout. Never before had a film taken the time to establish the lawyer lead character in such detail, likewise for his children, and the supporting characters who populate the movie. The film is balanced in the spotlight it shines on the adult characters, but also, on the younger characters. It is as if the viewer knows the characters, and what they are going through, in a thorough manner. It is easy for the spectator to feel an affinity for, and closeness to, the characters because of this.

The movie was also notable for the number of elements and themes that it explores in an exhaustive fashion, such as family, loyalty, racism, ignorance, childhood games, and coming of age. It was equitable in this respect, with all of these ringing true, never being out of place. The film's piece de resistance, being the trial of a black man suspected of raping a white woman, is probably the most moving, incisive, tragic courtroom scene ever presented to audiences. Lacking the melodrama that can sometimes make courtroom scenes risible to viewers, it is as if a true event is unfolding in real time for the spectator, and this is largely emblematic of TO KILL A MOCKINGBIRD in its documentary-style approach.

Overview: Robert Mulligan was the director of twenty motion pictures over thirty-three years, with many years spent in television. His movies are stories with a sympathetic edge, making audiences comprehend what makes characters tick in an intensive manner. After spending several years working in television, Mr Mulligan made his directorial debut with FEAR STRIKES OUT (1957). The story of real-life baseball player Jimmy Piersall, it was notable for starring Anthony Perkins in his third movie role. After a few more years in television, Mr Mulligan made THE RAT RACE (1960). It was a comedy-drama with Tony Curtis and Debbie Reynolds as a musician who arrives in New York, and falls for a dancer. In a similar but more dramatic vein was one of his most famous pictures, LOVE WITH THE PROPER STRANGER (1963). Natalie Wood and Steve McQueen were, respectively, a department store assistant and a musician, with Miss Wood falling pregnant to Mr Queen's character. More great films followed in the years after for Mr Mulligan. BABY THE RAIN MUST FALL (1965) was a melodrama about a footloose man just out of jail, and trying to make it up to his wife and young daughter. Fine work from both Lee Remick and Steve McQueen as the lead actors, it was a memorable and moody piece of cinema, shot in stark black and white. 

Continuing with realistic stories and situations, 1967 marked the release of UP THE DOWN STAIRCASE. Featuring Sandy Dennis as a school teacher in a New York high school, it was hailed for its lead performance and its authenticity. Four years after this film, one of Mr Mulligan's most commercially successful movies was released, SUMMER OF '42 (1971). The sensitive recollections of a young man who falls in love with a married woman in the early 1940s, it is remembered for its performances, and the evocation of a time and place which Mr Mulligan delicately expressed on screen. Moving forward into the late 1970s, Mr Mulligan helmed BLOODBROTHERS (1978). A drama with Richard Gere as an Italian-American in the shadow of his older brother, attempting to carve his own niche in life, it was an actor's picture also starring Paul Sorvino and Tony Lo Bianco in major roles. Another distinctive film in his collection was SAME TIME, NEXT YEAR (1978). Taking CLOSE ENCOUNTER to a different level, it was about a married man and a married woman who embark on an affair, and meet at the same time every year when they first began their liaison. A touching observation of feelings and middle-aged angst, it provided great roles for Alan Alda and Ellen Burstyn as the couple in question. TO KILL A MOCKINGBIRD shared the sensibilities of Mr Mulligan's other films, whereby the viewer gains an intimate knowledge of the characters and their psychology, but added its own original touches.

It is the well-crafted story of lawyer Atticus Finch, and his young family in the Alabama of the 1930s, and how Atticus takes on the case of a black man accused of raping a white woman. Mr Mulligan takes his time with establishing the story and the characters who inhabit its world, making the viewer feel for them, and know them on a deep level. We understand what makes Atticus and his children tick, likewise for the peripheral characters who appear within the film's running time. While this works to a large degree, the first half of the movie is a little slow in retrospect, with some scenes taking too much screen time that could have been eliminated or shortened, tightening the film as a whole. Possibly this was done to make the first half more of a starting point for the characters and their situations, but it does hurt the film's impact slightly. This is the film's only downside, as the remainder of the elements are executed in an excellent manner.

The second part of the film, beginning with the court case, is where the pieces start to fall into place, and where it really finds its footing. It seems as if the first part was a warm up for the second half, but what a second half it is. The courtroom scene, working back and forth from lawyer to defendant, lawyer to witnesses, is breathtaking in its execution. The writing and acting meld together in such a cohesive, emotive manner in these sequences, that one forgets that they are watching a film, and it invites belief in the proceedings. Mr Mulligan is also to be credited for his balanced view of racial relations in the film. Both sides of the equation are presented to audiences to consider, without showing favour for one or the other in an impartial manner. The movie is one that elicits varied feelings in the spectator which would certainly lead to discussion of racial relations and identity. In looking at the film as a whole, though, and whatever its faults, it can be said that TO KILL A MOCKINGBIRD is a genuine and rewarding film experience that reflects well of its director, and his humanistic view of life.

Acting: The acting in TO KILL A MOCKINGBIRD is one of its strongest assets. In the lead role of Atticus Finch, Gregory Peck was in his finest hour in this film. A character of strength, determination, fearlessness, courage and empathy, Mr Peck is the glue that holds the film together, his presence assuring the film of its success. A handsome actor whose serious nature made him suitable for films with a deeper view of humanity, Mr Peck is in his element as Atticus. As his daughter Scout, Mary Badham was a revelation of a child actress. Going toe to toe with Mr Peck in all their scenes together, it is as if she was really his offspring, and they were also matched in terms of her being his conscience. Miss Badham is featured in some of the most moving scenes ever filmed by a child actress, so affecting is her acting that one forgets that she is acting; she is Scout. There are three other performers whose work in the film deserve recognition.

Brock Peters, as Tom Robinson, the man accused of rape by Mayella Ewell, provides some of the most soul-stirring work in TO KILL A MOCKINGBIRD. Seeing Mr Peters on the witness stand, cracking under the pressure of an intense trial, is something that would wring tears out of even the most hardened of viewers. Mr Peters, quite simply put, is brilliant in these sequences. Also excellent in the film is Collin Wilcox Paxton as Mayella Ewell, the young woman who put Tom Robinson in this predicament. Miss Paxton does well as the impulsive, unjust, confused young woman, the viewer able to read her feelings from her face and body language. The final acting part of note is James Anderson as Bon Ewell, Mayella's rough, racist father. Playing a character with such villainous intent can sometimes make a part one-note, but Mr Anderson makes the character understandable, even if he can be thoroughly repellent at times.

Soundtrack: Elmer Bernstein's excellent instrumental soundtrack adds a thoughtful, solemn touch to the movie. Used appropriately in all respects, and especially during the quieter segments, it heightens the suspense when necessary, but, on the other hand, creates a warm, inspirational aura.

Mise-en-scene: The locations and sets in TO KILL A MOCKINGBIRD are exceptional, painting a vivid picture of life in the 1930s South for viewers. The film's sense of milieu is peerless, positioning the characters in this with realistic backdrops that are authentic to the eye. It is as if this small town really could have existed in real life, with sets such as the Finch family home the standout. The courtroom is also notable, providing a clear view of the actors and the proceedings for the audience in these pivotal scenes. Also deserving unreserved praise is the film's photography. Russell Harlan's cinematography is just perfect, especially the scenes set during the evening, with shadows and darkness adding a haunting atmosphere to the action. This is one of many post-1960s films in which black and white works exceedingly well to capture past times, and highlight serious content, such as HUD (1963) and THE LAST PICTURE SHOW (1971).

Award-worthy performances in my opinion: Gregory Peck, Mary Badham, Brock Peters, Collin Wilcox Paxton, James Anderson.

Suitability for young viewers: Parental discretion advised. Adult themes, low-level violence.

Overall Grade: B

LinkIMDB Page

Trailer