Thursday, February 10, 2022

INTERVIEW WITH SINGER-SONGWRITER JANIS IAN

I have the immense pleasure today of welcoming a very special guest, singer-songwriter Janis Ian, to CINEMATIC REVELATIONS for an interview. Janis has had many hits over the years including ‘Society’s Child’, ‘At Seventeen’, ‘Fly Too High’, and ‘Love Is Blind’, to name just a few from her extensive discography. Janis’ work has also been recognized with two Grammys, with a further ten nominations. In this interview Janis will be discussing her rendition of ‘Here Comes The Night’ featured in THE BELL JAR [my review of the film can be found here] singing, acting, and being the recipient of two Grammys. 

Welcome to CINEMATIC REVELATIONS Janis! 

Athan: When did you first realize that you wanted to be a singer? 

Janis Ian and Joan Baez

Janis: Probably when I was ten years old, and began playing the guitar. I'd seen Odetta the year before, and she really influenced me. And of course, Joan Baez. 

Athan: Where did you study music? 

Janis: Hm. I never actually "studied" beyond piano lessons from when I was 2 ½ to when I picked up the guitar at ten. I had a lot of piano teachers; we didn't have much money, and we moved around, so there wasn't much stability. I did get a grounding in the basics of reading music and playing piano, but (for instance) only figured out what the middle pedal on a grand piano did when I was in my 30's. I picked up guitar by reading chords and songbooks and playing along with records. I was also fortunate that even though she was inexpensive, I had a great voice coach in Newark when I was about twelve – my Dad insisted I take lessons, to make sure I preserved my voice. Since then I've had, I think, three other vocal coaches, all of them good. 

In terms of orchestration, I taught myself with a couple of books and two albums – West Side Story and The Rite of Spring. I scored both by ear because I didn't know you could purchase scores. 

Athan: Your songs display a social consciousness, specifically with regard to women’s issues, but with universal appeal. ‘Here Comes The Night’, which was played at the conclusion of THE BELL JAR, was beautifully performed, and evocative of the pensive tone that the picture expressed so well. What inspired you to write this song? 

Janis: Gosh, if I knew where inspiration came from, I'd bottle it, sell it, and be a billionaire. I have no idea. It's very rare that a song can be traced directly to a source of inspiration. I think that one sprang off the piano part. 

Athan: How did it feel to have your song featured in the closing credits of THE BELL JAR? 

Janis: Well, clearly, being part of something with Julie Harris performing in it is an absolute honor. Writing for a film, or finding a song that suits a particular film, is always interesting because there are so many possible interpretations. When it's used with another form, whether film or a Broadway musical, I believe the music needs to move the plot forward (if that's where it's placed, West Side Story being a great example) and/or comment on the work itself. That's where "Here Comes the Night" was so perfect. 

I did have some difficulties making the music supervisor and producers understand why I chose to have the background vocals, the evocation of the South, but in the end I think they got it. 

The most difficult thing about that film was that the song was originally pretty slow, more like the live in London version on Hope, an album of old material I released for fans a couple of years ago. We were in the studio, tracking it, with the background vocals almost done, when they called to say I had to shave a minute off it! I don't mind telling you, that was quite a challenge… 

Athan: You studied with Stella Adler at her acting school, and have performed in one motion picture, and on television. In which way do you find acting was of assistance to you when performing live in concert, or during recording sessions? 

Janis: Stella Adler gave me a language for things I'd only felt. She gave me a confidence in my talent, and tools to work with that talent. I'd say the things I got from her classes are more relevant to my writing than performing or recording – the use of imagination, for instance, and of creating a back story for characters. 

Athan: You won a Grammy in 1976 for Best Pop Vocal Performance, and in 2013 for Best Spoken Word Album. How did it feel to be honored for your work at the Grammys? 

Janis Ian with Grammy in 1976

Janis: It's great. I won't deny that it's great. But I get concerned about the whole function of an "awards show", especially now that they're sooooo huge. My first nomination was around 1967, and it was still a small business, with very few categories. Now, it's a huge industry, with tons of categories. I think sometimes we try to make everyone happy, to the ultimate detriment of the object itself. I also worry that kids are being trained to think art is always a contest. It's not a contest. It shouldn't be a contest. 

Athan: In addition to singing, you have also authored several books. In which way do you feel that writing assists singing and songwriting, and vice versa? 

Janis Ian Grammy 2013

Janis: Two different disciplines, two different arts, but ultimately, all art abides by the same rules and structures. Beyond that, I really don't know, sorry! 

Athan: Do you have any upcoming projects of which you would like to tell readers? 

Janis: Well, I'm about to leave on my final North American tour, and I've just released The Light at the End of the Line, my final solo studio album. We're talking about going to Europe, UK, Ireland in 2023, but that's about it. I want to stay home and write!!! 

Thank you so much today for your time Janis, and for the insight you have provided into the art of song, THE BELL JAR, acting, writing, and the Grammys. It has been wonderful having you on CINEMATIC REVELATIONS. You are welcome to return whenever you wish. 

Janis Ian links 

+Janis Ian official website 

+Janis Ian IMDb Page 

+THE BELL JAR IMDb page 

+Janis Ian Twitter page

+Janis Ian Instagram page 

Monday, February 7, 2022

FIVE QUESTIONS FOR ACTOR DAVID ZOOEY HALL ABOUT I DISMEMBER MAMA

I am very happy today to welcome back actor David Zooey Hall to CINEMATIC REVELATIONS for a new feature on the blog, ‘Five Questions’. David has been on the blog previously elaborating about his part as Rocky in FORTUNE AND MEN’S EYES and many other topics; the interview is here. In this post David here will be discussing his role as Albert Robertson in I DISMEMBER MAMA [my review of the film can be found here] which was an excellent interpretation of a troubled, psychopathic young man with many layers. 

Welcome back to CINEMATIC REVELATIONS David!

Athan: Your acting in I DISMEMBER MAMA, as with all your performances, was infused with a reality, and depth, that made Albert utterly compelling to watch. Despite his heinous actions, one still felt a sympathy for Albert, which is a mark of thoughtful acting. What was it that drew you to taking on this part?

David: According to Paul Leder (Director) he saw my photo in the Players Directory, contacted me and offered me the part when we met in person & I said “Ok.”

*

Athan: Albert was a character involved in many heavy sequences throughout the movie which provided a thorough insight into his shattered state of mind. Which were the scenes that, for you, were the most challenging emotionally to film in I DISMEMBER MAMA?

David: There were a couple. One was having to kiss Geri Reischl, who played Annie in the film. Geri was very sweet, kind & talented. And about to receive her very first kiss in reel life as well as in real life. And was apprehensive about it. I never asked her how old she was. But I guessed she hadn’t reached the double digits yet. And all I could think of was: “Don’t screw this up for her – it’s her first kiss & all.” I have a sister I adore in real life. And have always felt protective of. That’s what the kiss was: not the character I was portraying, but me, as a person, extending a protective gesture to Geri, my sweet partner in the scene we were playing – in the form of a kiss.

*

Athan: Paul Leder was the director of many feature films, ranging from comedy in MARIGOLD MAN, adventure epic APE, murder suspense in THE BABY DOLL MURDERS, and the comedic zaniness of THE WACKY ADVENTURES OF DR. BORIS AND NURSE SHIRLEY. What was it like working with Mr Leder on I DISMEMBER MAMA?

David: He was wonderful. The first day of shooting Paul was explaining to me the first shot that was about to take place. Cigarette in his right hand. All of a sudden in mid sentence he begins to tilt to the left and then his long frame suddenly hurtles across the room …  hits the wall in front of him – and crumples to the floor. He hits the wall with such force that his glasses fly from his face, and the cigarette he’s smoking flies out of his hand to the right. Then he starts groping on the floor to the right for the cigarette, which he somehow puts his right hand on. Then, with his left hand he locates his glasses. Then he somehow gathers himself up, crosses back to me on the other side of the room – and picks up the conversation we were having exactly & precisely where he left it. Then, after taking a big drag on the cigarette still smoking, he says to me: “Don’t worry about what just happened. Its just a little Vertigo that comes on from time to time. Nothin’ to worry about.” I remember thinking at this exact moment: “This is going to be interesting.”

*

Athan: Have you kept in contact with any cast members or crew from I DISMEMBER MAMA?

David: Actually, I kept in touch with Paul’s wife, Etyl. She worked at a Drug store in Hollywood. And whenever I was in the area, I’d stop in & visit Etyl.

*

Athan: While I DISMEMBER MAMA was serious in tone, glitches and fun moments can abound on movie sets. Was there a humorous time during filming that you remember with fondness? 

David: That would have to be my answer to question #1. Whenever I’ve thought about that first exchange with Paul Leder, the first day of shooting - it makes me smile. Glad I had the chance to work with him.

*

It has been a pleasure having you again on the blog David, and I thank you for giving readers a further understanding of the complex, charismatic Albert Robertson, and, in turn, I DISMEMBER MAMA. You are always welcome to return whenever you wish.

David Zooey Hall links

*David Zooey Hall IMDB page

*I DISMEMBER MAMA IMDb movie page

*The Actor’s Sanctuary homepage


Saturday, February 5, 2022

INTERVIEW WITH FILM DIRECTOR FRANC RODDAM

Today I have the immense pleasure of welcoming a very special guest, director Franc Roddam, to CINEMATIC REVELATIONS for an interview. Franc has directed a broad variety of motion pictures over the years such as QUADROPHENIA, THE LORDS OF DISCIPLINE [my review of the movie can be found here] THE BRIDE, ARIA, WAR PARTY, and K2. He has also been a producer and writer on several movies such as THE BOOK OF VISION, ARIA and QUADROPHENIA. In this interview Franc will be discussing his role as director of THE LORDS OF DISCIPLINE, his producing and writing work, and as founder and chairman of multimedia Ziji Publishing.

Welcome to CINEMATIC REVELATIONS Franc!

Athan: When did you first realize that you wanted to be a film director?

Franc: I grew up in a small town in the North of England, there were two cinemas at the end of my street; one known locally as ‘The Fleapit’, because it was built on a swamp, and the second called ‘The Modern’ because it was an art deco building. From a very early age, I used to go to the cinema as often as possible. Sometimes, if it was what was termed an ‘A’ film you had to have an accompanying adult. All the kids would ask somebody in the queue, ‘can you take us in, mister?’ then abandon them once we got into the cinema. Occasionally, somebody would pay for your ticket, which was a real treat. I loved Westerns, and saw hundreds of them, but the A films were often films with Bogart and Cagney in them, and as an 8- and 9-year old kid, they had a certain mystery and magic for me. Being from such a provincial town, I did not realise cinema was available to me as a profession. It’s only when I was traveling as a young man and got a job as an extra on a film in Greece that I saw the whole thing laid out in front of me and thought, I want to do this. When I came back to London from my trip, I happened to be sharing a flat with somebody from film school, which I also did not know existed. I applied, got in, and had great success at the London Film School. I was hooked. 

*

Athan: Were you influenced by the oeuvre of movie directors from Classic and New Hollywood, British, or international cinema in your filmmaking?

Franc: I found inspiration and influence from a whole plethora of film-makers. I started with John Ford and John Houston, moved on to Kurasawa, loved the Italian and French cinema of the sixties and early seventies. I had particular favourites: I loved Erice’s The Spirit of the Beehive, and The South. The cinematic poetry of those films left a long impression on me. I embraced it and tried to incorporate it into my work. So, John Ford and John Houston for storytelling, Kurasawa for cinematic energy, French and Italian cinema for intellectual content and Erice for poetic pieces. 

*

Athan: You were featured as an extra in the 1967 science fiction comedy THE DAY THE FISH CAME OUT. Did you study acting, or have aspirations to be an actor before becoming a director?

Franc: As a child, I wanted to be the hero in the film, rather than the actor in the film so I never saw myself taking up the acting profession. It requires a certain confidence and calmness that I seem to lack.

*

Athan: Your direction of THE LORDS OF DISCIPLINE was flawless, making it a prestigious and memorable motion picture, one of my favourites. What is it that drew you to directing the movie?

Franc: After Quadrophenia, I was invited to work in Hollywood with 20th Century Fox. I wanted to make a film called Rainforest, about the destruction of the Amazon; in 1978 no-one knew what I was talking about but the Fox executives went along with it. I spent six months in the Amazon and over 2 years with Spencer Eastman, wrote a fantastic script. It was going to be my Citizen Kane, and it would save the save the world. Robert Redford became attached to it but after long and protracted dealings with him, he eventually pulled out, which coincided with a management change at 20th Century Fox, and my film got dropped. I’d spent 2 years on this enterprise and realized I had to make a film soon. I gave myself 2 goals: to make a film that was both innovative and moral. Rainforest had those qualities. Jeffrey Katzenberg, an executive at Paramount at the time, took me to breakfast at the Beverly Hills Hotel and said, “You haven’t made a film for more than 2 years, you’d better do this one.” I realized it was not an innovative film, but it would be moral and that’s why I decided to take it. The central theme is about institutions and hypocrisy, which can apply to many a country and, honestly, particularly, the USA right now. I had a fantastic time making this film with all the young actors that I chose and my cameraman and collaborator, Brian Tufano. I looked at the film again recently, after 32 years of not seeing it, and strangely enough it does seem relevant to now. 

*

Athan: What did you find most exciting about the experience of making THE LORDS OF DISCIPLINE?

Franc: With Lords of Discipline, I assembled a group of young actors, and like with Quadrophenia, the actors who did not get the main parts, were given small parts, or even extra parts. I had a company of actors working with me that I knew, and would do anything to make the film work. My great and lasting experience is working with them. 

*

Athan: For you, what was the most demanding, but emotionally satisfying segment of filming THE LORDS OF DISCIPLINE?

Franc: I wanted to make sure that I was presenting an institution to the audience, so there are a fair number of set pieces in the film with large crowd scenes. For instance, the arrival of the new cadets in the college, which is about 3 minutes into the film, there’s a very complicated shot in the corridor, which introduces the scale and behavior at the college. I foolishly shot it on my first day; it runs for 3 or 4 minutes, which is above the daily average that any director is expected to achieve. Setting up took me until 4.30 in the afternoon, so when the people in Paramount got the report of the day, it said, “Time of turning over: 4.35; number of shots achieved today: 1.” In Hollywood they prefer turning over at 8.30 in the morning and getting 12 set-ups by end of day. They also like to be able to cut into a set-up, with this one they couldn’t. They were about to fire me on the first day of filming and sent their crusty old production manager from LA to get me. I convinced him to let me carry on and that long sequence is in the film in its entirety. There are other sequences like in the chapel or the cadets singing Dixie, that are also quite big set-ups. I’ve noticed in my films like Quadrophenia, War Party and Lords, that I often will create a big scene. To me, it’s part of the grandeur of cinema and I enjoy them. The court case was particularly difficult in the film because you have to hit all the beats so there’s a large number of shots, which is different from my normal style. A court scene must be precise. 

*

Athan: Have you kept in contact with any cast members and crew from THE LORDS OF DISCIPLINE?

Franc: My best buddy from Lords of Discipline was the actor, Bill Paxton, who sadly passed away a couple of years ago. We were big mates to the end. Also, Malcolm Danare, who played Poteete and Michael Biehn and was in K2. Brian Tufano has been a lifelong friend, we worked together many times on film, television and commercials. Brian held my hand in the early days of my career. 

*

Athan: Television production has been a great area for you in terms of output, being format creator of Auf Weidersehen, Pet, Making Out, Harry, The Canterbury Tales, and Masterchef just some of the many projects you have headed. What are some of the main differences you find in comparing film, and television?

Franc: I started a production company, hopefully to raise revenue to pay for film development and Masterchef was originally an idea set up that would pay for the secretaries and the telephones! It’s now the biggest cooking show in the world and is seen by 300 million a year. With regard to the other programs you mentioned, I did not direct any of them but they were an outlet for my creativity whilst I was waiting for a ‘yes’ on some movie or other. All of these programs were very successful, I am proud to say. I did direct the mini-series Moby Dick and Cleopatra; they had healthy budgets and healthy schedules, which made them attractive to me. I shot Moby Dick at Point Cook in Melbourne and it was the best film experience of my life. I loved the Australian film crews, they were men and women after my own heart.  

*

Athan: You founded multimedia company Ziji Publishing in 2004, where book publishing is teamed with film production. What have been your proudest moments thus far with Ziji?

Franc: Ziji has provided me with many proud moments. Masterchef, of course, is its biggest achievement, and employs something like 10,000 people around the world. The third book we published, The Last Templar, sold approximately 6 million copies. I’ve also been able to help a number of young film-makers get their projects started in script form.  

*

Athan: Do you have any upcoming projects of which you would like to tell readers?

Franc: I’m developing one screenplay for myself to direct, and several TV series, which I will produce, should they be picked up. I still find cinema as exciting as I did when I used to go to The Fleapit three times a week. 

*

Thank you so much today for your time Franc, and for the insight you have provided into THE LORDS OF DISCIPLINE, directing, production, and publishing. It has been wonderful having you on CINEMATIC REVELATIONS. You are welcome to return whenever you wish.

*

Franc Roddam links

+Franc Roddam IMDb Director Page

+THE LORDS OF DISCIPLINE movie IMDb page

+Ziji Publishing official website


Friday, February 4, 2022

THE LORDS OF DISCIPLINE (1983)

Title: THE LORDS OF DISCIPLINE

Year of Release: 1983

Director: Franc Roddam

Genre: Drama, Suspense

Synopsis: A senior cadet at a Carolina military school encounters hazing by fellow students designed to weed out undesirable candidates; disgusted by this, he tries to stop these incidents from happening.

Within a film history context: While hazing has been the subject of quite a few movies over the years, particularly with reference to its occurrence in universities, hazing taking place in military academies has been less frequent onscreen. The first notable example was John Ford's SALUTE (1929), in this story of two brothers in a military academy. Featuring a single incident of hazing which is more comical than serious in intent, it did not delve as such into this in a deep manner, more concerned overall with the romantic aspects of the story. NAVY BLUE AND GOLD (1937), directed by Sam Wood, featured a scene where a student at a naval academy is subjected to off-screen hazing by a smarmy upperclassman. Alfred Green's THE DUKE OF WEST POINT (1938) was about a haughty young man from England who enrols in the West Point military academy, and is ignored by the other cadets when he violates the academy's honor code. NAVAL ACADEMY (1941), directed by Erle C. Kenton, was set in a military reform school. There is a scene where one of the students is subjected to hazing by several upperclassmen, falling into a swimming pool with his hands tied, and eyes covered, but is saved by a fellow student. One of the most incisive depictions of hazing could be found in Jack Garfein's THE STRANGE ONE (1957). In a Southern military college, a charismatic but sadistic young Cadet dominates his fellow students with deceptive and bullying tactics, but is undone by his deplorable behavior. A dark movie which boasted excellent acting, particularly by Ben Gazzara in the lead, and George Peppard, Pat Hingle, and Peter Mark Richman in support, it was a challenging, but rewarding movie experience. THE LORDS OF DISCIPLINE was akin to the films mentioned above, but added its own distinctive flourishes to the topic of hazing in military academies.

THE LORDS OF DISCIPLINE is closest to THE STRANGE ONE in terms of its uncompromising treatment of hazing within the narrative. Both examine the emotionally devastating effects of hazing on its victims, highlighting those who disagree with it, finding it morally objectionable. Both of these movies are more explicit in depicting the hazing incidents, particularly THE LORDS OF DISCIPLINE, which is something the earlier movies such as NAVY BLUE AND GOLD could only refer to verbally, but not show onscreen due to the censorship of their day. THE LORDS OF DISCIPLINE differed from THE STRANGE ONE in that the hazing did not have overt homosexual overtones, but was more along the lines of power and racism. Where both movies did coincide is that the perpetrators of the hazing are brought to account, which gives the audiences of THE LORDS OF DISCIPLINE and THE STRANGE ONE a comforting notion of justice being rightly served. There are some other variations between THE LORDS OF DISCIPLINE and the earlier movies which deserve mention.

Where THE STRANGE ONE has a number of characters who rail against the hazing, and put a stop to it eventually, in THE LORDS OF DISCIPLINE this weight is carried by one character. THE STRANGE ONE has Jocko dominating the other students physically and psychologically, while in THE LORDS OF DISCIPLINE it is a group of students, named The Ten, who carry out the hazing. The Ten are more of a faceless entity in the movie, their uncovering a suspenseful part of the film, but Jocko is anything but hidden. In addition, THE LORDS OF DISCIPLINE, as such, did not have the romantic subplots or feel that permeated earlier examples such as SALUTE and NAVY BLUE AND GOLD. While there was the presence of girlfriends of the military academy students in the film, by and large this thread took a backseat to the dominant hazing storyline in THE LORDS OF DISCIPLINE. This was something that THE STRANGE ONE also shared with Jocko and his fleeting romantic pursuit. One of the most trenchant films about hazing in military academies, or in any setting ever produced, THE LORDS OF DISCIPLINE is a compelling movie.

Overview: Franc Roddam is a British director who has made six films over his career, with one movie segment in an anthology motion picture. His first film, QUADROPHENIA (1979) was a portrait of a young man in 1960s London, clashing with his parents, becoming involved with drugs, and generally indulging in anti-social behavior. THE BRIDE (1985) was a horror movie about a group of scientists who create what they believe is the ideal woman, but with a number of unexpected repercussions. Franc Roddam directed a segment in ARIA (1987) entitled "Liebestod", which followed the escapades of two ill-fated lovers, starring Bridget Fonda and James Mathers. WAR PARTY (1988) was a drama concerning the recreation of a century-old battle between the US Cavalry and Native Americans, which causes contemporary problems for its participants. Mr Roddam's last film to date, K2 (1991), detailed the adventures of two men, based upon a true story, who aimed to climb the K2 mountain in Pakistan. THE LORDS OF DISCIPLINE was Franc Roddam's second motion picture, and one of his best.

With THE LORDS OF DISCIPLINE, Franc Roddam has made a carefully-constructed, crisp film which is a winner. Based upon the novel by Pat Conroy about life in a 1960s Carolina military academy, specifically following hazing incidents taking place among its students, it is an engrossing, thoughtful movie that keeps the attention from beginning to end. The atmosphere is well-managed, maintaining a balance between light but also, more serious moments. The movie also lacks a melodramatic nature, preferring for a more naturalistic, easy-going approach. While THE LORDS OF DISCIPLINE is at heart a somber work, it never becomes depressing or maudlin, despite its subject matter. It makes its points succinctly, without ever becoming morose, or violent in showing hazing. It does not exploit its subject matter for cheap visual thrills, something which is to be commended. THE LORDS OF DISCIPLINE thus does not wallow in depravity, something a lesser filmmaker would readily consider. Further features of the movie are also worthy of discussion.

While it could be argued that the lack of a distaff side does not allow for other points of view in the movie, this does not matter overall. THE LORDS OF DISCIPLINE is tightly-made, and stays consistent to its storyline, never making needless deviations. Aside from its examination of hazing, THE LORDS OF DISCIPLINE is also a character study, with Will at its center. Although The Ten are brought to justice, one does not experience the fallout from this, but how this entire episode marked Will's life. The movie could have spotlighted the frenzied reactions of those in The Ten to being caught, but it shies away from this. It does not as such present the story as one with revenge elements, as Will was the movie's epitome of truth and honor, which would not have been suitable given this. THE LORDS OF DISCIPLINE handles matters in a more subtle manner, keeping the ambience on an even, more nuanced keel. A movie that has unfortunately been vastly underrated over the years, THE LORDS OF DISCIPLINE is one of the best films of the 1980s, and a great example of Franc Roddam's cinematic artistry.

Acting: THE LORDS OF DISCIPLINE offers many great performances which bolster the movie. In the lead role of Will McLean, David Keith is excellent. As the upright Will, who encounters many obstacles along the way in his search for the truth, Mr Keith is entirely convincing. An actor with an air of both integrity and a generous nature, the personable Mr Keith is the cornerstone of the movie. Rick Rossovich, as Dante, Will's friend and roommate at the academy, brings a sense of both the comic, and dramatic to his part. Watching Mr Rossovich verbally and physically thrashing his roommates is great fun, then his reaction to being accused of a crime, deftly expresses both comedy, and pathos, exceptionally well. In his movie debut as Tradd, Will's roommate and best friend, Mitchell Lichtenstein brings another complicated character to the screen. An actor with a veneer of quiet calm and comforting voice that distinguishes protagonists more intricate than first meet the eye, he does exceedingly well as the smooth, charming Tradd. Malcolm Danare, as Poteete, is striking as the tragic academy student who makes an irreversible decision. With his unique voice and acting style, Mr Danare makes Poteete a riveting figure it would have been great to have seen more of in the movie. There are four other contributions in the acting department that make THE LORDS OF DISCIPLINE a fine film.

As the oily and scheming John, Will's nemesis, and the movie's central villain, Michael Biehn is an effective figure of malice and devil-doing in THE LORDS OF DISCIPLINE. With his subtle body language, careful movements, and magnetic stare, Mr Biehn is excellent as the methodical, evil John. In a small role as Abigail St. Croix, mother of Tradd, Barbara Babcock makes the most of her cameo as the relaxed Abigail. It is entertaining watching the married Abigail trade quips with Will, and make friendly advances toward him. G.D. Spradlin, as General Bentley Durrell, kingpin of the military academy, is fine as the officious General with more than one skeleton in his closet. Seeing him swallow his pride in the final scenes is one of the film's highlights. The final acting of note was by Robert Prosky as Bear. With his cigar-chomping and grizzled demeanour, Mr Prosky adds both humor, and authority to THE LORDS OF DISCIPLINE with the seen-it-all Bear.

Soundtrack: THE LORDS OF DISCIPLINE has a rousing theme which is utilized both during the opening credits sequence, and closing credits. The latter version is a sprightlier version of the one during the opening credits, reflecting the change in tone from the start, and end of the movie. The film also contains musical accompaniment throughout its run, ranging from the intimate scenes of character revelations, to the sequences of hazing with startling graphics.

Mise-en-scene: THE LORDS OF DISCIPLINE has meticulous attention to mise-en-scene. The scenes at the military academy, both indoors and exteriors, the family home of Tradd St. Croix, the diner, the Ten's meeting place, to name several examples, are all well selected, and impart valuable information which support the story and its characters. Costuming is also of a high standard, with uniforms, and attire worn when the students are in civilian mode, all reflecting the movie's 1960s setting. Cinematography by Brian Tufano is also beautiful, the colour just right without being too bright, and in keeping with the film's thoughtful nature. Both daytime, and nighttime filming is also impressive, the viewer being able to see the action clearly during both parts of the day.

Notable Acting Performances: David Keith, Rick Rossovich, Mitchell Lichtenstein, Malcolm Danare, Michael Biehn, Barbara Babcock, G.D. Spradlin, Robert Prosky.

Suitability for young viewers: No. Infrequent coarse language, male nudity, adult themes, medium-level violence.

Overall Grade: A

LinkIMDB Page

Trailer



Tuesday, February 1, 2022

THE FARMER (1977)

Title: THE FARMER

Year of Release: 1977

Director: David Berlatsky

Genre: Drama, Crime, Revenge

Synopsis: A man about to lose his family farm to bank foreclosure becomes involved in a crime incident to save his property.

Within a film history context: Movies particularly focusing on farmer protagonists have been in existence since the silent period. James Kirkwood's BEHIND THE SCENES (1914) followed the life of a farmer who marries a stage actress, charting the various emotional, and economic ups and downs the couple experience together. The British silent FOX FARM (1922), directed by, and starring Guy Newall, was about a farmer trying his best to placate his social climbing wife, and her reaction to his sudden bout with blindness. With F.W. Murnau's SUNRISE (1927) a farmer torn between his wife, and another woman undergoes many psychological hurdles in his journey, but finally returns to his wife. THE FARMER'S WIFE (1928), directed by Alfred Hitchcock, was about a widowed farmer whose daughter has just married, leaving him living on his own. Wishing to remarry, with his late wife's blessing, he has a difficult time finding an appropriate prospective bride, but is surprised as to the identity of the woman who wants to marry him. The 1930s had several interesting films dealing with farmer characters.

F.W. Murnau's CITY GIRL (1930) detailed how a farmer married a woman from the city, but her life on the farm with him is anything but simple, his father especially an obstacle in the marriage. THE WORLD CHANGES (1933), directed by Mervyn LeRoy, concentrated on a farmer who becomes financially successful, but whose life concurrently takes a nosedive. Lighter in tone was Victor Fleming's THE FARMER TAKES A WIFE (1935). A farmer working on the Erie Canal falls for a cook, but they finds themselves at odds due to his love of farming. THE GOOD EARTH (1937), directed by Sidney Franklin, was about the immense struggles of a married Chinese farmer couple, and how the arrival of a young woman tempts the husband, causing havoc in their lives. Entirely different in tone was Ken G. Hall's comical IT ISN'T DONE (1937). An Australian farmer inherits an estate in England, and is a fish out of water trying to adapt to upper class customs and mores. BLOCKADE (1938), directed by William Dieterle, was historical in scope, with a Spanish farmer fighting in the Spanish Civil War, and falling for a Russian woman. 

Into the 1940s, romance was the attraction in Garson Kanin's THEY KNEW WHAT THEY WANTED (1940). A farmer maintains mail correspondence with a young woman, but complications ensure when he sends an image of someone else as himself, the woman wanting to marry him. One of the most famous films about a farmer was SERGEANT YORK (1941), directed by Howard Hawks. Based on the real-life story of Alvin York, it followed his life from that of a farmer, to fighting in World War I, decorated soldier, and difficulties in his return to civilian life. More fantastical was William Dieterle's ALL THAT MONEY CAN BUY (1941). A farmer who has had nothing but bad karma in his life sells his soul to the devil, but matters are not as straightforward as he initially anticipated. DRAGON SEED (1944), directed by Jack Conway and Harold Bucquet, was about a Chinese farming family in World War II, and their resistance to Japanese invasion, a woman making her presence felt in drumming up opposition to the oppressor. In complete contrast, Roy Rowland's OUR VINES HAVE TENDER GRAPES (1945), followed the life of a Norwegian farmer in Wisconsin, and the coming of age of his intuitive, spirited young daughter. 

LADIES' MAN (1947), directed by William D. Russell, was of an entirely different persuasion. The humorous happenings of a farmer who suddenly becomes a millionaire, hunted down by a variety of money-hungry women was a comic showcase for Eddie Bracken in the lead. Elia Kazan's western THE SEA OF GRASS (1947) had a complicated farmer character, portrayed by Spencer Tracy, who causes not only his wife torment but also, others with whom he comes into contact. Comedy once again ruled the roost in THE EGG AND I (1947), directed by Chester Erskine. A young couple become chicken farmers, but there are more than a few bitter pills for the wife to swallow in coming to terms with her new life in this financially successful movie. The 1950s and beyond brought forth other variations on farmer characters.

Stanley Donen's musical SEVEN BRIDES FOR SEVEN BROTHERS (1954) featured a central farmer protagonist in search of a wife, and consequently finding significant others for his six brothers in the process. In a similar vein OKLAHOMA! (1955), directed by Fred Zinnemann, has a farmer in love with a young woman, and the narrative tracks their romance with music and comedy to spare. Moving into the 1970s was John Trent's HOMER (1970). A farmer and his musician son come to loggerheads over the former's nonconformist attitudes toward war and other matters, and the film documents their fraught relationship with accuracy. One of the most heartfelt depictions of a farmer can be found in SOUNDER (1972), directed by Martin Ritt. An African-American farming family is stunned when their father is sent to jail for stealing ham, the family's oldest son becoming their rock until the father is released from jail. 

Jan Troell's ZANDY'S BRIDE (1974) had a brutish farmer who treated his mail-order wife as chattel, until they come to mutual understanding about their lives. Equally strong was MR. MAJESTYK (1974), directed by Richard Fleischer. A melon farmer in financial dire straits unwillingly becomes involved with underworld figures in this Charles Bronson star vehicle. Clint Eastwood's THE OUTLAW JOSEY WALES (1976) was set during the American Civil War. A farmer, whose family was murdered by Union soldiers becomes an outlaw, hotly pursued by Union militants in this western. THE FARMER was reminiscent of the films about farmers which were dramatic in nature, but possessed many of its own distinguishing traits.

In comparing THE FARMER to earlier movies from the genre, despite its leaning toward action and violence, does detail the ups and downs of operating a farm, and some of the hardships encountered. These were shown in great detail particularly in THE GOOD EARTH, and less so, but still present in DRAGON SEED, THE EGG AND I, HOMER, SOUNDER, and MR. MAJESTYK. The difficulties of farm life in THE FARMER are depicted in several scenes without being the overriding focus of the picture, also being the case in MR. MAJESTYK. A farm in foreclosure is the main motivation in THE FARMER for its lead character to consider, and eventually become involved in criminal activity, for the sake of saving his property from going to the bank. This is the predominant thread which is the impetus for its main character, Kyle, in what he does for the majority of the film.

A focus on violence is something which THE FARMER shares with MR. MAJESTYK, in that the lead is thrown into chaos as a result of involvement with underworld figures, but THE FARMER is most extreme in its forcefulness in this arena. The savagery displayed by Kyle in THE FARMER is linked to his status as a war hero, receiving the Silver Star for bravery, and therefore taking down those who have caused his friends Gumshoe and Johnny, and girlfriend Betty, angst and death. There is the subtle message that war can take place not only on the battlefields but also, in small rural towns, and that it is all about the survival of the fittest. THE FARMER, therefore, is largely lacking in sentimentality, and views of cozy rural life present in THE FARMER TAKES A WIFE, OUR VINES HAVE TENDER GRAPES, OKLAHOMA!, and THE EGG AND I. While it is a harder-edged take on films with bucolic backgrounds, there is also a sense of Kyle ending the avalanche of crime, making way for peace, and a happy ending for himself, and Betty. A thrilling addition to movies about farmers, THE FARMER is one of the strongest films in the genre.

Overview: David Berlatsky was an editor, with many credits in both cinema, and television. His sole movie as director was THE FARMER, and as this is the case, the review will concentrate upon his contribution to the film. With THE FARMER, David Berlatsky has fashioned an entertaining, brooding motion picture. It is a movie which has an assured pace, and scenes which unravel in a satisfying manner. The movie offers the viewer sufficient information about the characters, and story, without being bloated. As this is a film which explores themes of brutality, loyalty, and revenge, Mr Berlatsky has not shied away from depicting extreme violence, but this is something to be expected of a film which deals with these topics in such a vigorous manner. While the movie as such is quite savage, it is justified by the context of the diegetic world the characters inhabit. THE FARMER, though, is clearly a film of contrasts. On the one hand, it is no holds barred visually in terms of its treatment of violence, on the other hand, it is subtle in examining concepts such as loyalty, and defending one's honour, and life. While this is pleasing to witness in a film of THE FARMER's strength, it does, in retrospect, expose flaws that could have made the movie even better.

THE FARMER presents certain situations, such as Kyle's relationship with Johnny, likewise with Kyle and Betty's union, in muted tones, that consequently leave many questions unanswered. The movie adequately depicts these relationships, and it is understandable to the viewer as to what is going on, and why events occur. The absence of scenes that could have fleshed these out more, though, is slightly disheartening. How Johnny bonded with Kyle, and convinced him to carry out his wishes, is not particularly evident. Likewise, Betty is a hard-boiled dame in the beginning, but at the end is with Kyle on the farm, seemingly blissful. These ellipses are a little jarring, but, all in all, this points to one quality of THE FARMER that cannot be disputed. Being a 1970s film, it does contain those features which were present in many New Hollywood movies, such as ambiguity of character motivations, and leaving things to the imagination of viewers to decipher. There are, though, other features of the movie which also deserve analysis.

Despite containing much violent content, THE FARMER, as such, does not whitewash this, being, violence for the sake of violence. It does not revel, or linger in death and mayhem to a great degree, and actually contains one scene where a death is artfully done, with sound effects, but no carnage. Overall, there is a build-up to these horrific events which shows thought has gone into these, and consequently the movie, as a whole. Criminality is not glamorized, and the people who have committed heinous crimes are wholeheartedly punished for their transgressions. They are figures who are fully villainous, with no redeeming features. The rapist, for example, is a man of absolutely no scruples or sympathy, which is how this perpetrator should be presented. To the movie's credit, the victim fighting back, and not succeeding, is one of the most affecting parts of THE FARMER, lacking exploitation. The positioning of Betty in the movie is also one which has many facets.

It is implied that Betty becoming involved with Kyle was her process of 'purification' away from her former loose life, and that only an earnest country man such as Kyle, on the side of justice, could 'redeem' her. Her rape at the hands of Weasel thus was her final connection with the underworld; her punishment cruel, but 'cleansing' her. Aside from this, there is also the low-key motif in THE FARMER of fighting for one's life against all the odds, especially when the chips are down, and all seems lost. Kyle is called upon to do something which appears to him at the outset to be morally wrong, but his viewpoint alters when those in his life have either been killed, or affected. The related theme of loyalty also comes to the fore in a most surprising manner. This links both the start, and the end of the film in a cohesive way, and shows that what one does in life, even seeming insignificant at the time, can carry weight at the most opportune moment. Human nature is something that cannot always be predicted, and should never be underestimated. These are the moments where THE FARMER is at its height. A riveting work on crime and punishment, THE FARMER deserves definite critical reappraisal for the handling of its themes.

Acting: THE FARMER has a unique cast of thespians who elevate the film considerably with their contributions. In the lead part of farmer Kyle Martin, Gary Conway is an intriguing mixture of compassion, dignity, but also, utter relentlessness. A performer with a personable aura of poise and thought, he is excellent. Angel Tompkins, as Betty, Kyle's love, does well as the initially hardened woman who finds another side to life with the farmer. As the only female cast member in a predominant male ensemble, Miss Tompkins stands out. As the strapping Johnny, bookmaker, and Betty's first lover, Michael Dante lends a touch of agreeable toughness to the movie, and makes one feel for his plight with his understated acting. With his slicked-back coif and air of menace, Timothy Scott is thoroughly effective as Weasel. Even though Weasel commits some reprehensible acts, Mr Scott is able to gain a  surprising measure of sympathy from the viewer in his last moments in the movie. George Memmoli, as crime boss Passini, is another excellent interpretation. A fiery man who does what he says, never wavering in his villainy, Mr Memmoli makes Passini another fascinating figure in the film. There are four other actors whose roles are also noteworthy in the movie.

THE FARMER is unique in that it has four actors in smaller parts who nevertheless make their presence felt in the picture. Stratton Leopold, as Laundry Sam, one of Passini's henchmen, utters hardly any dialogue in the film, but whose appearance as the nefarious heavy carries weight in the two sequences in which he is present. Corrigan, Johnny's beefy, dutiful bodyguard is brought to life by Sonny Shroyer. His body language, and the use of his eyes make Corrigan another striking character in THE FARMER. As Kyle's partner on the farm, Ken Renard is touching as Gumshoe, a man whose devotion to Kyle and the farm readily apparent. The final contribution of note was by Johnny Popwell as Matt Conners, the man Kyle saves on the train. Mr Popwell's passion is evident in the final scenes, utilizing his voice and face to express a plethora of emotions, rounding out the fine acting in THE FARMER.

Soundtrack: The musical theme is one of the most memorable features of THE FARMER. 'American Dreamer', beautifully performed by Gene Clark, is a haunting tune that perfectly encompasses the sense of tragedy that the movie exudes. It is played at certain intervals through the film, and an instrumental version in some scenes. Incidental music by Hugh Montenegro is suitable to THE FARMER, making tender scenes softer, and, on the other hand, heightening the sequences of death and mayhem.

Mise-en-scene: What appears in front of the screen for viewers has received excellent attention to detail in THE FARMER. As the movie is set in the 1940s, costume design by Vicki Sanchez deftly reflects this, with the majority of characters dressed in suits appropriate to the era, and the personalities of the players. The farmer himself cuts an imposing figure with his leather jacket, hat and sunglasses, giving him an aura of assurance that lends itself to his cool, calm and collected nature. Both interior and exterior locations, such as the laundry cleaning company, Kyle's farm and surroundings, to name a few, are all effective, and well selected. Cinematography by Irv Goodnoff is of a high standard, particularly emphasizing the sleepy, beautiful rural landscapes the farmer inhabits, contrasting these with the well-lit scenes of terror scattered throughout the picture. 

Notable Acting Performances: Gary Conway, Angel Tompkins, Michael Dante, Timothy Scott, George Memmoli, Stratton Leopold, Sonny Shroyer, Ken Renard, Johnny Popwell. 

Suitability for young viewers: No. Infrequent coarse language, male nudity, female nudity, adult themes, high-level violence.

Overall GradeB

LinkIMDB Page

Trailer