Saturday, October 9, 2021

WHERE THE BOYS ARE (1984)

Title: WHERE THE BOYS ARE

Year of Release: 1984

Director: Hy Averback

Genre: Comedy, Romance

Synopsis: Three young women take their spring break in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, in search of love and excitement.

Within a film history context: Sex comedies released in the 1980s were a common fixture on cinema screens during the decade, with an array of themes and topics explored in this time period. These were a mixture of films with adult protagonists, and others with teen characters. One of the first was Gilbert Cates' THE LAST MARRIED COUPLE IN AMERICA (1980). The study of a middle-aged couple's marriage, and the influence on the couple of outside unions, gave Natalie Wood and George Segal great roles as the central duo. A teen-oriented spin on the genre was provided by THE HOLLYWOOD KNIGHTS (1980), directed by Floyd Mutrux. The adventures of a car club consisting of teenagers during an evening in 1965 was reminiscent of AMERICAN GRAFFITI, but with nudity and sexual situations not present in the latter movie. In retrospect, THE HOLLYWOOD KNIGHTS is mainly notable for the appearances of up and coming actors such as Michelle Pfeiffer, Tony Danza, and Fran Drescher. Joseph Ruben's GORP (1980) was in a similar vein. The antics of teenagers in a Jewish summer camp made up the content of this picture, also with a cast of now-familiar faces such as Dennis Quaid, Rosanna Arquette, and, once again, Fran Drescher. Adultery, on the other hand, was the crux of LOVING COUPLES (1980), directed by Jack Smight. In this movie, a couple cheat on each other with people who are connected, with comic results. 

One of the most recognized, if infamous, sex comedies of the 1980s was Bob Clark's PORKY'S (1981). This tale of high school students in 1954 Florida, highlighting their sexual exploits, and the shenanigans of the eponymous club, was a tremendous box-office success, if critically derided, and led to two sequels. Equally saucy in tone was PRIVATE LESSONS (1981), directed by Alan Myerson. The story of a tryst between a young man and his family's maid was high on sexual content, but made a great profit to its producers on this basis. Blake Edwards's S.O.B. (1981) revolved around a Hollywood film producer who has just made his first flop, and how he tries to rescue both the movie, and his reputation, by turning the picture into a soft-core production. With SO FINE (1981), directed by Andrew Bergman, a man in dire financial straits develops a style of jeans that become a sensation - pants with the buttock area exposed. In comparison, Richard Brander's MALIBU HOT SUMMER (1981) examined the sexual, and other activities of three young women co-renting a Malibu beach house. The movie is mainly of interest historically as Kevin Costner's film debut. Another film with three female protagonists was WAITRESS! (1981), directed by Lloyd Kaufman and Michael Herz. In this movie, three young women become involved in all manner of raucous incidents, such as battling amorous customers and crazy cooks. Charlie Loventhal's THE FIRST TIME (1981) was about a young film student pursued by young women only too ready to offer themselves to him, but having to put up with his wacky film professor at the same time. 

Taking a leaf out of MALIBU HOT SUMMER was THE BEACH GIRLS (1982), directed by Bud Townsend. Two college friends visit their demure friend who is living at her uncle's beach house, and effectively take it over, hosting wild parties and the like, the quiet young lady eventually letting her hair down. Alternately, Bruce Paltrow's A LITTLE SEX (1982) had a young Lothario almost ruin his marriage with his womanizing antics, in this comedy romance. Shades of PORKY'S were evident in THE LAST AMERICAN VIRGIN (1982), directed by Boaz Davidson. A trio of male high-school student indulge in sexual antics with the usual exploits and female nudity thrown in, but with some serious moments interspersed. Akin to this, but with a much more humorous slant was Robert Rosenthal's ZAPPED! (1982). A high school student discovers he possesses telekinetic powers, and uses these to not only exact revenge on some bullies, but also for erotic stunts. FAST TIMES AT RIDGEMONT HIGH (1982), directed by Amy Heckerling, was about the mis-adventures, specifically of the sexual kind, of high school students in a California high school. Notable for making stars of many of its performers, it grossed a healthy profit for its studio. 1983 had a number of films in the sex comedy genre which explored varied themes and topics. 

Sean S. Cunningham's SPRING BREAK (1983) focused upon two young men who go to Florida for their spring break, with associated episodes of comedy, sex, and topless female nudity. Raunchy nostalgia was again on display in SCREWBALLS (1983), directed by Rafal Zielinski. Set in the 1960s, this film was concerned with the antics of several high school students obsessed with a local beauty, and led to two sequels. A definite period atmosphere was evoked by Gerry O'Hara's FANNY HILL (1983). Set in 1700s Britain, a young woman moves from one bed to another seeking not only carnal pleasure but also, happiness in this erotic comedy. A sex comedy that rang the box office bell was RISKY BUSINESS (1983), directed by Paul Brickman. A young prospective college candidate holds a wild party while his parents are absent, but not everything turns out the way he expected in this insightful movie. Less edifying was Michael Herz and Lloyd Kaufman's THE FIRST TURN-ON! (1983). This movie followed the racy happenings at a summer camp, with lots of sexual content and nudity as per this genre's general tone. More serious was THE MAN WHO LOVED WOMEN (1983), directed by Blake Edwards. A sculptor finds that his need to have women in his life leads him to therapy, and subsequently falls for his doctor. This was a quieter, more subtle addition to the genre, and gave its cast, headed by Burt Reynolds in the lead role, good opportunities to emote. 

Curtis Hanson's LOSIN' IT (1983) once again traversed through nostalgia territory, with four young men in 1965 determined to rid themselves of their virginity, and undertaking the usual exploits these movies followed. Mainly notable for its cast including Tom Cruise, Jackie Earle Haley and Shelley Long, it was a loss-maker for MGM. Another sojourn into teenage frolics was served by JOYSTICKS (1983), directed by Greydon Clark. The move to close a video arcade in a small town by a businessman elicits anger in its patrons, and they retaliate in a non-violent, but comic manner. As with PRIVATE LESSONS, the older woman/younger man concept was again on show in Lewis John Carlino's CLASS (1983). A sensitive young man studying in preparatory school becomes friendly with a fellow student, who encourages him to find himself. Going to Chicago, he meets an older woman, and begins an affair, but is rocked when he discovers her real identity. MY TUTOR (1983), directed by George Bowers, was another film in the older woman/younger man context. In this instance, a wealthy man employs an attractive tutor for his son, who needs to pass French class to enter university. As with PRIVATE LESSONS and CLASS, the film follows the same formula of an irresistible older woman seducing an eager younger man, with obstacles and misunderstandings placed in their way. WHERE THE BOYS ARE had some elements in common with the sex comedy genre, but diverted in other ways.

The movie's structure was akin to entries such as MALIBU HOT SUMMER, WAITRESS! and THE BEACH GIRLS, in that the lives of several young women were examined, but WHERE THE BOYS ARE veered away was in the tone of the movie, and its treatment of sexual content. While the three movies mentioned here largely traded in female nudity and sex scenes, in WHERE THE BOYS ARE these were of a more muted nature. The protagonists of WHERE THE BOYS ARE do talk about sex, but the film in essence is geared more toward romance than sex. There is one bedroom scene in the movie, and no nudity in this sequence, as it is more dialogue-oriented than showcasing sex. The concentration on romance makes WHERE THE BOYS ARE a more mature, but dreamy version of the films with harder content. There are other differences when WHERE THE BOYS ARE is compared to other films in the genre.

WHERE THE BOYS ARE is slightly alike SPRING BREAK in some areas. In the case of SPRING BREAK, several young men head to Fort Lauderdale, Florida, for their spring vacation, getting into all sorts of scrapes, as do the young women in WHERE THE BOYS ARE. The showcasing of actors in skimpy swimwear or in a state of undress is where both films also coincide. As a matter of fact, WHERE THE BOYS ARE only contains one sequence of topless female nudity, while SPRING BREAK has many more scenes of these. WHERE THE BOYS ARE has a focus on characterization among the mischief which sets it apart from SPRING BREAK. There is one example of this which is of interest in the movie. The characters' predilection toward music also gives WHERE THE BOYS ARE a spirit lacking from all the other movies in this category. WHERE THE BOYS ARE has a character who is a classical pianist, his friendly romantic rival also involved in music, which is something that works not only in an aural sense but also, does not seem out of place in the movie. Having one suitor win his true love over his rival through music is something that brings a smile to the face, and provides the film with a charm and delicacy lacking in the other entries. An entertaining addition to the sex comedy genre, WHERE THE BOYS ARE is a pleasant film to watch.

Overview: Hy Averback was the director of six motion pictures over his eighteen year career, being more active in television series and telemovies. His films are mainly comedic in approach, with the exception of his inaugural movie. CHAMBER OF HORRORS (1966) was a horror picture about a psychopath with one hand who murders a woman, and is sought by police, seeking to exact revenge on anyone who wants him apprehended. In comparison, comedy was the focus of WHERE WERE YOU WHEN THE LIGHTS WENT OUT? (1968). The story of a woman and her husband during the New York City blackout of 1965, it was a vehicle for Doris Day, but also showcased Robert Morse, Terry-Thomas, and Patrick O'Neal in support. Mr Averback followed this movie with the hip I LOVE YOU, ALICE B. TOKLAS! (1968). An attorney, through a wacky series of events falls for a hippie, leaving his fiancée, and taking on the hippie life, with comic results. THE GREAT BANK ROBBERY (1969) was Hy Averback's next project, a comic western about a scheme to rob a bank in Texas. Comedy again reigned in Mr Averback's penultimate film, SUPPOSE THEY GAVE A WAR AND NOBODY CAME (1970). It concerns a community dance, and how the residents in a small town react to the employees of an army base. As Hy Averback's final movie, WHERE THE BOYS ARE had the same sense of way-out humor common in his comedy films, but with some differences.

Hy Averback has made a picture which is entertaining overall, with some revealing moments that are most unexpected. A movie about four young women who make the trek for spring break in Fort Lauderdale has been handled with an emphasis on the comedic and romantic elements, making WHERE THE BOYS ARE a fun cinematic ride. The romance between studious Jennie Cooper and enterprising Scott Nash, who the young women pick up on the side of the road, is the film's highlight, and best love story. There is also a nice love triangle with pianist Camden Roxbury, who is Jennie's musical idol. This love triangle also has a great twist, with rivals Scott and Camden connecting in a scene which gives the film a subtle sweetness that works. Sandra's romance with married policeman Ernie is where the film's pathos comes to the fore, given emotional weight by the fact that only Sandra does not find love at the movie's end. While there are some great moments in WHERE THE BOYS ARE, there are also weaknesses which do not assist it.

In trying to be outrageous, WHERE THE BOYS ARE does stumble in the taste department. Having the young ladies smoke drugs does take away from their dignity, which subtracts from the movie. The related scene of them with a male blow-up doll is one of the film's most protracted, unfunny sequences. It takes too long, and does nothing to give more insight into the characters. All it does is waste valuable time that could have been utilized for other, more revealing scenes. In a similar manner, the party gatecrashing is another segment that could have been abbreviated. It begins in an amusing manner, but goes downhill fast. Thankfully the hot bod contest at the beach does not take as long to unravel, has some humorous moments, and is not as demeaning as the previously-mentioned scenes. In saying this, though, one of the faults of WHERE THE BOYS ARE is that it showcases scenes that should have been shorter, to the detriment of richer insights into characters. Several examples come to mind.

The romances of Carole and Laurie are not given enough scope in WHERE THE BOYS ARE. Why exactly Carole was tired of her boyfriend, and the reasons she needed a break from him, were not sufficiently explored. Their bed scene in the beginning threw some light about their relationship, but was inadequate. In addition, Laurie setting her sights on 'Conan', and the accompanying fallout from this was handled in a cheesy manner. Laurie's subsequent hooking up with Camden was not presented sufficiently to the audience to comprehend why they were to be a couple; it was a case of just accept it, and move on. The story of Sandra and policeman Ernie, in hindsight, was also problematic. Their romance had a big build-up with the scene where Ernie prosecutes both Sandra and Laurie, where they spend a night in jail, but the middle section was uneventful. One of the film's most telling moments is where Sandra discovers that Ernie cannot leave his wife and family, but this is a little too late in coming. In summation, certain things can be said about WHERE THE BOYS ARE. Although it has some positive qualities, the lack of depth in much of the storytelling renders it uneven, which is unfortunate, as its breezy atmosphere lends it an enjoyable, if sometimes mindless, air.

Acting: WHERE THE BOYS ARE has a number of notable acting contributions which aid the film considerably. In the lead role of Jennie Cooper, Lisa Hartman has a relaxed, radiant screen presence, making it understandable how two men would compete for her affections in the movie. As Scott Nash, the hitchhiker Jennie and the other women pick up on their way to Fort Lauderdale, Russell Todd does a fine job as the handsome, ambitious young man whose heart belongs to Jennie. An actor whose gifts in romantic roles were not adequately presented in film, but delivered beautifully here, Mr Todd is well-matched with Lisa Hartman, their chemistry palpable. As the third party in this love triangle, Daniel McDonald is great as Camden Roxbury, the pianist who appears haughty on first impressions, but with a poignancy which makes his character rounded. On the other hand, Lynn-Holly Johnson, as Laurie, was not used in a suitable manner in WHERE THE BOYS ARE. An actress with spirit and spice has been wasted in stories that are trite in their execution, and does not allow Miss Johnson to stretch her acting muscles in the film. Similarly, Lorna Luft, an actress with a sense of comedy and timing, is also wasted in the movie as Carole. Just having her as the zany young woman undervalues her abilities, which is a shame. There are several other players whose acting deserves attention.

Howard McGillin, as Chip, Carole's boyfriend, has some good moments as her confused other half, which gives the film credence. His authority and sincerity emanate in a small role. As Maggie, Alana Stewart's role in the film is not fully fleshed out. The companion of Barbara, and confidant to Chip, she has a number of interesting scenes, but these arrive too late in the film. Louise Sorel, as Barbara Roxbury, is entertaining as Camden's mother, and Maggie's friend. An actress recognized for her humorous, and dramatic portrayal of aristocratic Augusta Lockridge on television soap opera Santa Barbara, here she is comfortable playing a character of comparable mien, with her deadpan one-liners a treat. As Southern Belle Sandra, Wendy Schaal steals scenes as the flirty, man-hungry woman who ends up in an unexpected romantic quandary with a police officer. In the final performance of note, Asher Brauner is perfect as Officer Ernie Gasso, Sandra's unrequited conquest. Seeming ever inch a policeman in his uniform, playing his role with a laconic charm and lack of histrionics, Mr Brauner gives a natural performance that makes his character's predicament all the more shattering, and real, in the movie.

Soundtrack: WHERE THE BOYS ARE has an eclectic rock music soundtrack that complements what is taking place onscreen. There are instances where the music played is part of the diegetic world, such as in the mansion gatecrashing scene, and in the nightclub sequence. The most notable piece in WHERE THE BOYS ARE is 'Jennie', which is performed in the segment where Camden plays it on the piano as a classical piece, and is pre-empted by Scott in a more modern, high-tech rendition.

Mise-en-scene: The film has a good mixture of both indoor, and outdoor sequences. There are copious location scenes such as the beach hot bod contest, the mansion party gatecrashing by speed boats, and Jennie and Scott's time on the beach, that no studio could reproduce. Interiors such as the crazy hotel at which the young women stay, and Barbara's elegant mansion, to name two, are all appropriate to the story. The cinematography by James Contner is crisp, and at its best when capturing beach settings and the exteriors of Barbara's mansion, and its riverside canal.

Notable Acting Performances: Lisa Hartman, Russell Todd, Daniel MacDonald, Howard McGillin, Louise Sorel, Wendy Schaal, Asher Brauner.

Suitability for young viewers: No. Infrequent coarse language, brief female nudity, adult themes.

Overall GradeC

LinkIMDB Page

Trailer



Tuesday, October 5, 2021

INTERVIEW WITH ACTOR ROBERT F. LYONS

I have the immense pleasure today of welcoming a very special guest, actor Robert F. Lyons, to CINEMATIC REVELATIONS for an interview. Robert has acted in many motion pictures over the years, including PENDULUM, GETTING STRAIGHT [My review of the film can be found here] THE TODD KILLINGS, DEATH WISH II, AVENGING ANGEL, 10 TO MIDNIGHT, MURPHY’S LAW, THE OMEGA CODE, and DEADLY EXCHANGE, to name a few examples. In this interview Robert will be discussing his part in GETTING STRAIGHT, acting, The Actors Studio, Stella Adler Studio of Acting, television, and his role as acting coach.

 
Welcome to CINEMATIC REVELATIONS Robert!

Athan: When did you first realize that you wanted to be an actor?
 
Robert: Great question for me, I never thought about it at all. I just sort of knew that that was what I wanted to do & be as a teen and stated it and my parents supported my decision - so after high school I went to NYC - so, it was more of me just knowing what I was going to do - I did not like school and any 9 to 5 did not grab my interest - acting was it.
 
*
 
Athan: You are a Life Member of the Actors Studio, where many exceptional actors have studied over the years, and also studied at the Stella Adler Studio of Acting. What was it like working there with acting teachers such as Lee Strasberg and Stella Adler?

 
Robert: It had been a goal to be a member of the Studio - like wow - Dean & Brando had been there and so many other great actors - I finally auditioned and Lee accepted me - I saw a lot of wonderful teaching by the moderators mostly at the Studio. That was different with Stella, she was an amazing teacher, a person so dynamic so demanding and very clear on her statements to me on my acting - I had already been doing stage, TV & Movies when I studied with Stella so what she had to say was at the top of my learning and it made great sense - a lift up. See, I had always studied acting even after working a lot - Milton Kaselas was also a wonderful teacher - I loved working out and taking on bigger and or challenging parts, stretch my acting, my knowledge and go into areas demanding a bigger part of myself so as to grow some more.
 
*
 
Athan: Your performance in GETTING STRAIGHT as the charismatic, psychologically complex Nick, who gave Elliot Gould’s Harry Bailey more than a few problems, was wonderful. How did you become involved in this production?

 
Robert: Richard Rush's secretary saw my performance in the film: Pendulum and loved my work and helped promote me to Rush and often - I got to audition & on the 2nd audition it was with Elliott Gould & we worked well together and did a dynamic scene in his office. Later I got a call to come to Oregon and was given the role of Nick.
 
*
 
Athan: What did you find most exciting about the experience of making GETTING STRAIGHT?
 
Robert: It was my 2nd feature film, I was thrilled, realizing somewhat that I'm living my dream and fulfilling some acting goals - working with other actors - getting a deeper understanding of acting with myself and how to use myself more - that's the shorter answer.
 
*
 
Athan: For you, what was the most demanding, but emotionally satisfying segment of filming GETTING STRAIGHT?

 
Robert: There's a long scene later in the film 4 minutes plus long - I found how to do something, you know, make something work, acting wise that was very hard for me to do as an actor in this scene. I put demands on myself for that scene.

*
 
Athan: Have you kept in contact with any cast members and crew from GETTING STRAIGHT?
 
Robert: No, not really. I run into one or two once in a while - but that's what it is like in most films. You get to make friends and go on - it is very exciting to meet new people and get to know one another very fast and get along and do work together of this type - exciting when it works out.
 
*
 
Athan: GETTING STRAIGHT was directed by Richard Rush, who also directed many other movies such as PSYCO-OUT, FREEBIE AND THE BEAN, THE STUNT MAN, and COLOR OF NIGHT. What was it like being directed by Mr Rush in GETTING STRAIGHT?


Robert: Richard said something to me on my first scene, during our rehearsal and it gave me an idea that put a main character color there for me - I was grateful - he knew how to talk to actors as I saw it.
 
*
 
Athan: Apart from cinema, you have appeared in many television shows and telemovies. What for you are the main differences between acting in feature films, and acting on television?


Robert: Less time to do any research so you have to be faster on the study part if it is needed - but you bring to the role what you can in the time you have to create it - there is no difference you hope, in your quality - I strive to have my personal standard always present - I don't like to walk through a part or think what I'm doing, is not good or important to the scene, play, etc. no matter if is stage, TV or film. After all, it is your work - I learned that one is doing a film and you have to get it right after a while you know yourself better too and what you are capable of creating and pulling it off well - like anything in life, the better you understand it the higher the quality should be, I think, anyway.
 
*
 
Athan: You made your film debut in 1969 in PENDULUM, with GETTING STRAIGHT being your second movie. Your last released movie thus far has been DEADLY EXCHANGE in 2017. What for you are the most striking differences between filmmaking in the early 1970s, and today?

 
Robert: For me it is mostly the writing - you have cameras, crew, actors, directors, etc. those things have to be there to make film - the attitude and quality of all combined makes the project as a whole, work or it is a lousy piece of work.
 
*
 
Athan: You have been an acting coach for many years in Los Angeles. What is it about coaching students in acting that gives you the most satisfaction?


Robert: Seeing a person grow with their chosen art form.

*
 
Athan: Do you have any upcoming projects of which you would like to tell readers?
 
Robert: Not presently on the acting front - one that hasn't been released yet but I'll hold the title until I get the news on it. I will be doing more acting that is for sure. Writing too, I sold a screenplay some years back & have written others & 2 are ready to film - now to find the right production people to get it into production.
 
*
 
Thank you so much today for your time Robert, and for the insight you have provided into the art of acting, The Actors Studio, The Stella Adler Studio, GETTING STRAIGHT, television, cinema, and your role as an acting coach. It has been a joy to have you on CINEMATIC REVELATIONS. You are welcome to return whenever you wish.
 
Robert: Thank you and all the best to you.

*

Robert F. Lyons links





Friday, October 1, 2021

BUS RILEY'S BACK IN TOWN (1965)

Title: BUS RILEY'S BACK IN TOWN

Year of Release: 1965

Director: Harvey Hart

Genre: Drama, Romance

Synopsis: Bus Riley returns home from the Navy to his family, and finds things for him have changed on many fronts.

Within a film history context: While there are plenty of films dealing with U.S. Marines, or Navy sailors during the wars, there are less movies on the topic of them returning to civilian life after participating in the service. One of the first was John Ford's THE BLUE EAGLE (1926). In this movie, two friends in the Navy return to their home after completing their stint in the Navy. As civilians they compete for the love of a young woman, which is settled via a boxing match between the two men, and they become involved in other activities. Another film about life away from the Marines, but in a lighter vein, was HAPPY-GO-LUCKY (1936), directed by Aubrey Scotto. A woman sees a man in a nightclub who resembles her Marine husband, believed dead, this leading to much intrigue. Mystery and suspense dominate Anthony Mann's STRANGERS IN THE NIGHT (1944). An American Marine who has been discharged due to injuries suffered in World War II seeks to meet the woman who sent him a book, and wrote to him when in hospital, but finds danger and dirty deeds awaiting him upon his return home to the United States. A light touch was evident in the comical SNAFU (1945), directed by Jack Moss. An irreverent take on returning Marines, it is about a teenager who signs up for the Marine Corps, and sent to battle. Once it is realized by his parents where he has been, and what he has done, he is sent home, but finds difficulties in assimilating back to his old life. 

PRIDE OF THE MARINES (1945), directed by Delmer Daves, was the real-life story of Marine Al Schmid, who returned a hero from fighting overseas during World War II. The film covered his recovery from not only his physical wounds, but also, his psychological scars, and, his marriage to his wife. In a similar, but more romantic slant, was Charles Martin's NO LEAVE, NO LOVE (1946). As with PRIDE OF THE MARINES, a young Marine returns home a hero, but in this film, he becomes involved with a radio singer, and subsequently in both musical, and comic interludes. Suspense ruled STEP BY STEP (1946), directed by Phil Rosen. A returned Marine falls into a web of lies, mystery, and murder, with Lawrence Tierney in a sympathetic part playing against type from his usual role as the heavy. Another biography of a Marine was presented in Francis D. Lyon's CRAZYLEGS (1953). The story of sports star Elroy Hirsch, it mainly followed his sporting achievements rather than his military service. Another biographical account of a real-life figure was THE OUTSIDER (1961), directed by Delbert Mann. The story of Native American Marine Ira Hayes was dramatized with Tony Curtis in the lead role. The movie charted Mr Hayes' triumph upon returning home, to his eventual decline through alcohol abuse. BUS RILEY'S BACK IN TOWN contained elements of other films featuring returned Marine and Navy soldiers, but diverted greatly in other areas.

In BUS RILEY'S BACK IN TOWN there is a focus on a returned Marine protagonist, essentially a character study, something shared by entries such as STRANGERS IN THE NIGHT, SNAFU, PRIDE OF THE MARINES, CRAZYLEGS, and THE OUTSIDER. Where BUS RILEY'S BACK IN TOWN moves away from these is in the depiction of its lead character. Compared with the above films, which largely dealt with the psychological repercussions of being in the Navy, or in the Marine Corps, Bus in BUS RILEY'S BACK IN TOWN is remarkably well-adjusted. While he has his moments, he does not fall apart, but reacts to life's ups and downs in a more muted manner. He does not become involved in intrigue or danger, but has enough issues with finding himself as a person upon his return to life as a civilian. There is no trumped-up peril for him, only the challenge of everyday life knocking on his door. It is refreshing seeing Bus, for example, trying to avoid the advances of his ex-flame, who decides she wants him again, looking for employment, and, being a member of a family as the only male among three women. This gives BUS RILEY'S BACK IN TOWN a more relatable, naturalistic feel than the more suspense-oriented titles such as STRANGERS IN THE NIGHT and STEP BY STEP. For these reasons, BUS RILEY'S BACK IN TOWN distinguishes itself as one of the most true-to-life, agreeable views of a returned Marine in film.

Overview: Harvey Hart was a Canadian director who sometimes made films in Hollywood, but much of his output was produced in Canada. The director of eleven movies, they are notable for their bold presentation, and challenging subjects. Mr Hart's second film, DARK INTRUDER (1965) was the tale of a man with supernatural powers who is called upon the solve the murders of women in San Francisco.  Next came THE SWEET RIDE (1968) a drama about various bohemian characters surfing, and riding their way around life, with a young woman providing the spice. One of Mr Hart's most-remembered works was the controversial FORTUNE AND MEN'S EYES (1971). The screen adaptation of John Herbert's stage play about his personal experiences in jail, it was a challenging journey through homosexuality and brutality in jail, but with excellent performances from Wendell Burton, Danny Freedman, and David Zooey Hall seminal as the complex, compelling Rocky. The distinctive MAHONEY'S ESTATE (1972), in utter contrast, followed a young man who wanted his slice of happiness in a rundown home in the country, with Alexis Kanner fine in the lead. 

Harvey Hart's best film was the excellent, unsparing SHOOT (1976). With shades of DELIVERANCE and SOUTHERN COMFORT, it focused upon a confrontation between two sets of men across a lake, and how armed retribution, and retaliation in general, does not always bring a better set of circumstances for those involved. A change of pace was evident in the pleasant GOLDENROD (1976). The story of a rodeo champion, and his marital, and familial problems, was handled in an inspiring manner, with Tony Lo Bianco in the main role, and Gloria Carlin as his harried wife. Into the 1980s, 1983 brought UTILITIES, Harvey Hart's final film to the screen. In this comedy-romance, a social worker becomes fed up with the shenanigans of utility companies, taking these on, and along the way falls for a policewoman. While not up to the standard of Mr Hart's earlier works, it nevertheless had some insightful moments. BUS RILEY'S BACK IN TOWN was Harvey Hart's debut motion picture, and a notable film on various grounds.

With BUS RILEY'S BACK IN TOWN, Harvey Hart has successfully made a film which seamlessly combines drama, pathos, and comedy, in its overriding character study of eponymous lead character Bus Riley. Based upon a play by William Inge, it adroitly explores the life of a young returned Marine, specifically dealing with his family life, romantic pursuits, employment travails, and mission for acceptance back home. The movie portrays Bus' life with sincerity, without casting aspersions on either himself, or those with whom he comes into contact. BUS RILEY'S BACK IN TOWN thus sweeps the viewer along for the ride with its careful, non-judgmental approach, making sure that character actions are always understandable to the spectator. This character-driven leaning gives the movie a likability and drive which assists it all the more. In particular, the scenes of the loving Riley family have a realism about them which makes the characters, and what is taking place, believable. Unfortunately, there are some aspects of the film which let it down slightly.

While the relationship between Bus and his mother, his younger sister Gussie and himself, both stand out in the movie, the union of Bus and his other sister Paula is not as well-drawn. While there is some conflict between Paula and Bus that plays out during the movie, it pales in comparison to the full-blooded repartee between siblings Bus and Gussie. In addition, there is another segment of the movie that could have been fleshed out more than it was. The beautiful connection of Bus and Judy is given some time in the film, but not enough. There was a lot of soul-stirring to be found here which was a great contrast to the shenanigans of Laurel trying to sink her hooks into Bus. Laurel and Bus together was another great part of BUS RILEY'S BACK IN TOWN, but it would have been nice to have witnessed more of Bus and Judy's scenes, these having a magic feeling to them. All in all, though, some things can be said about the film, despite its deficiencies. BUS RILEY'S BACK IN TOWN is a well-constructed, and directed movie that is reflective of Harvey Hart's keen approach to his characters and storytelling, making it a thoughtful viewing experience.

Acting: BUS RILEY'S BACK IN TOWN has a cast who all deliver distinctive performances. As Bus Riley, Michael Parks is a dynamic performer. Utterly believable as a young man searching for his identity and moral place in the world, Mr Parks does a great job. Laurel, the young woman who loves to twist Bus around her little finger, is finely portrayed by Ann-Margret. An actress who is on fire when the material calls for her to exude passion, and vulnerability, she is wonderful as the vampy, but also, needy Laurel. The film's maternal figure is played by the beautiful Jocelyn Brando, as Bus' mother Mrs Riley, the movie's moral core, and its most centred character. Her wise and thoughtful personality is in sharp contrast to many of the film's female characters, who are variously self-absorbed, and self-deceiving. The movie's most delightful acting is by Kim Darby as Gussie, Bus' sister. An impish, self-confident performer who brings pleasure to the film, the appealing Miss Darby makes all her scenes count in both the dramatic, and comic moments. Unfortunately Mimsy Farmer, as Paula, Bus and Gussie's sister, is not shown as effectively as her onscreen siblings. While there is some friction present in Bus and Paula's interactions, the actress is not around long enough to fully play this out, which is a disappointment. There are, though, several other performances in BUS RILEY'S BACK IN TOWN which are worthy of mention.

As the sensitive Judy, Gussie's best friend, and Bus' true love, Janet Margolin is wonderful. An ethereal presence who graced several films and much television, Miss Margolin shines as the unlucky Judy. There are also a number of actors in BUS RILEY'S BACK IN TOWN with small roles which have impact. As Judy's mother Mrs Nichols, Nan Martin makes the most of her small but pithy role as the attractive, but inebriated woman who tries to come on to Bus. Unfortunately, Brett Somers, as schoolteacher Carlotta, is not given the opportunity to create a deeper character. While Carlotta is a nod to Rosalind Russell's schoolteacher in PICNIC, there is nowhere near the depth of that character in Carlotta, which is a shame. The refined Ethel Griffies, as Mrs. Spencer, mother of the undertaker from whom Bus seeks work, is commanding in a brief role that has credence. Brad Dexter's interpretation of the smooth-talking vacuum cleaner salesman Slocum is another unique performance in the movie. With his deep voice and confident persona, Mr Dexter is thoroughly convincing in his role. Larry Storch, as barman Howie, Bus' friend, is earthy and realistic, bringing out another side of Bus. Mr Storch nicely rounds out the great acting contributions in BUS RILEY'S BACK IN TOWN.

Soundtrack: Richard Markowitz' perceptive score adds immeasurably to the success of BUS RILEY'S BACK IN TOWN. Comical in the lighter moments and solemn in the more serious stretches, it is always measured without being overpowering. 

Mise-en-scene: BUS RILEY'S BACK IN TOWN has excellent production values which give the movie an air of sophistication. While the movie is predominately set-bound, the sets are appropriate to the action, adding authenticity. Some examples stand out in particular for their veracity. The Riley family house is homey and warm, especially the living room and kitchen where much of the movie takes place. In contrast, Laurel's home is splashy, with expensive accoutrements befitting the wife of a successful businessman. Costuming in BUS RILEY'S BACK IN TOWN is also of a high grade, with the outfits worn by players suitable to the characters, and their personalities. Special mention must be made of designer Jean Louis'  stylish creations for Ann-Margret, and Rosemary Odell's for the remaining actors. In a more technical vein, Russell Metty's colour cinematography is first-rate, bathing the movie in a beautiful glow, and making everything appear special.

Notable Acting Performances: Michael Parks, Ann-Margret, Jocelyn Brando, Kim Darby, Janet Margolin, Ethel Griffies, Brad Dexter, Larry Storch, Nan Martin.

Suitability for young viewers: Parental discretion advised. Adult themes.

Overall Grade: B

LinkIMDB Page