Tuesday, June 23, 2020

HUD (1963)


Title: HUD

Year of Release: 1963

Director: Martin Ritt

Genre: Drama

Synopsis: A non-conformist clashes with his father for control of the family farm in Texas, and has other relationship issues with whomever crosses his path.

Within a film history context: Character studies of rodeo cowboys have been onscreen since the silent period of cinema. One of the first was silent film THE CALGARY STAMPEDE (1925), directed by Herbert Blache. In this movie, a cowboy is thought to have murdered his amour's father, but is declared innocent when the real culprit comes to light. In D. Ross Lederman's THE RIDING TORNADO (1932) Tim McCoy battles horse thieves and becomes involved in intrigue, while also falling for a young woman. Actor John Wayne featured in many films of the era as a rodeo cowboy, and Fred Allen's RIDE HIM, COWBOY (1932) was no exception. Here Mr Wayne takes on a horse which is thought to have committed murder, but his investigations lead to the real assailant, which lands him in jail. Many of the films of this era had a solid storyline which explored more dramatic angles, while others had a more comic outlook.

SOMEWHERE IN SONORA (1933), directed by Mack V. Wright, was a comedy drama of a cowboy attempting to curb the robbery of his lady friend's silver mine. In Lloyd Bacon's COWBOY FROM BROOKLYN (1938) a cowboy was challenged in his pursuit of a career in radio with a catch - that he show evidence that he was, indeed, a cowboy. In a similar humorous fashion, THE COWBOY AND THE LADY (1938) was a mistaken identity comedy, with a wealthy woman acting as a maid, and falling for a down-to-earth cowboy. The 1940s followed a comparable thematic line, with comedies, dramas, and musicals in the cowboy theme prevalent.

Gene Autry was the lead in CAROLINA MOON (1940), directed by Frank McDonald, with Mr Autry bringing justice to a place where landowners had been illegally divested of their holdings by an unscrupulous man, with some musical trimmings. In Joseph Kane's KING OF THE COWBOYS (1943), Roy Rogers joins forces with other men to end the demolition of government warehouses by criminals. Diverting from the previous themes, A LADY TAKES A CHANCE (1943), directed by William A. Seiter, mined more romantic territory. In this film, cowboy John Wayne entrances Jean Arthur, and they become an item. In contrast to the 1940s films, the 1950s movies brought with them less sentimental, and tougher explorations of the rodeo cowboy theme.

THE LUSTY MEN (1952), co-directed by Nicholas Ray and Robert Parrish, was a look into the more domestic aspects of a rodeo cowboy's life, with the wife of a cowboy baulking at her husband's involvement in the sport. Richard Fleisher's RODEO (1953), in a similar manner to THE LUSTY MEN, documented the impact of rodeo on a cowboy's life, and how this affected both himself, and his wife. Different in approach was BUS STOP (1956), directed by Joshua Logan. Starring Marilyn Monroe as Cherie and Don Murray as Bo, the film's cowboy protagonist, it explored the relationship between the leads, as Bo wanted to marry Cherie, and live with her on his ranch. Moving into the 1960s, John Huston's THE MISFITS (1961), was a realistic drama of a cowboy falling in love with a divorced woman, again with Marilyn Monroe, and the repercussions of this union. Following from this film, HUD also considered the cowboy theme in a true to life, and thoroughly effective manner.

HUD could be classified as the finest character study of a rodeo cowboy ever filmed, the most in-depth in terms of the psychology of its complex but engaging protagonist, aided by a gallery of equally finely etched supporting characters. It lacks the romanticism that marks films such as BUS STOP and the later JUNIOR BONNER (1972), but added its distinctive flair by concentrating upon the dynamic personality of Paul Newman. While HUD was not deadly serious as a movie, and had its share of amusing and diverting moments, these were not treated as comic asides, instead naturally occurring from the characters, which makes the film all the more lifelike. 

HUD, also, did not fall into the trap of attempting to classify its central character as being either the good guy/bad guy stereotype, as he fell somewhere in between both categories. This was another feature that distinguished the character from earlier more benign rodeo cowboy incarnations from the 1940s, and further back in time. HUD, in its trailblazing manner, also opened the door for other movies to explore the rodeo cowboy theme in varying comprehensiveness, such as J.W. COOP (1972) and later films THE ELECTRIC HORSEMAN (1979) and URBAN COWBOY (1980), to name but a few examples, with many more spanning until the present day.

Overview: Martin Ritt was a distinguished director of dramas that explored humanity in an intimate, touching, but thought-provoking manner. His career spanned over thirty-three years, and twenty-six feature films. Making his directorial debut with 1957's EDGE OF THE CITY, which examined the relationship between a black man and a white man, it was the first of his cinematic forays into race relations. THE LONG, HOT SUMMER (1958) was a successful movie dealing with life in a steamy Southern town, notable for its pairing of Paul Newman and Joanne Woodward. He again worked with Mr Newman and Miss Woodward in PARIS BLUES (1961), a drama about American jazz musicians in Paris who fall for two American girls there. Another noteworthy drama was 1962's HEMINGWAYS ADVENTURES OF A YOUNG MAN. It was another of his movies with a male lead, starring Richard Beymer as a man coming of age after World War I military service, and other life events. The 1970s afforded Mr Ritt more opportunities to tackle controversial themes with his distinctive even-handed touch.

THE MOLLY MAGUIRES (1970) was an historical drama of Irish coal mine workers rebelling against the inequity of their working conditions. With THE GREAT WHITE HOPE (1970), Mr Ritt focused upon a black boxer and his white female friend, their relationship and difficulties presented to the audience to ponder and consider deeply. He again looked at race and family relations in the beautiful SOUNDER (1972), treating all his characters with the utmost understanding, and inviting viewers to do likewise with his moving rendition of a sharecropping family in the Deep South. THE FRONT (1976) was another film that spotlighted discrimination, this time with a man using his presence as a front to submit blacklisted writers' works as his own, but finding it difficult to stay impartial with the prejudices taking place. Mr Ritt once again studied discrimination in NORMA RAE (1978), this time with a textile worker trying to make her workplace better by instituting union practices, and finding it difficult to improve working conditions. Another triumph for Mr Ritt, it garnered Sally Field an Oscar for her role as the determined Norma Rae. HUD, likewise, was another tour de force for Mr Ritt, and a movie that earned Oscars for performers Melvyn Douglas and Patricia Neal.

Adapted from Larry McMurtry's novel of the same name, Mr Ritt has made a film that is entirely satisfying, and in which deficiencies cannot be found. HUD flows exceedingly well from scene to scene, the editing greatly assisting its cause, the storyline handled with simplicity but sympathy for the main characters by the director and writers, and the actors delivering their performances in an unaffected, down-to-earth manner. Similar to THE LAST PICTURE SHOW (1971), also based upon a novel by Mr McMurtry, the source literature is of a very high standard, and the screen translation, is, again, flawless. Mr Ritt exhibits the same compassion and impartiality in HUD that he displayed in his other films, specifically SOUNDER and NORMA RAE, with honorable characters going up against those of the opposite persuasion, thereby allowing the audience to watch situations unfold, presenting both sides of the equation. A film that should be seen by all film buffs at least once in their lives, HUD stands tall as Martin Ritt's masterpiece, and a wonderful contribution to world cinema.

Acting: The acting in HUD is one of its most striking features, elevating it into a special movie viewing experience. In the lead role of Hud Bannon, Paul Newman offers one of his finest portrayals. Seething with passion, eyes frosty, delivering dialogue with sheer conviction, Mr Newman is utterly compelling as Hud. Seeming to lack any moral compass, Mr Newman displays a vulnerability in his character that only makes Hud all the more interesting, and complicated as a human being. Matching him is Melvyn Douglas as Homer, his straight-arrow father, which constitutes the father-son conflict that drives the majority of the movie's drama. Mr Douglas' earnest acting has a touching depth and tragedy that befits his stature as one of Hollywood's best-ever actors. Two other performances in HUD are also notable for the contributions in making the film the classic it is.

The versatile Patricia Neal is thoroughly convincing as the world-weary, put-upon Alma, the domestic assistant in the Bannon household. An actress with the ability to transfix the audience in her movies, Miss Neal makes the most of her participation in the film as Alma, sharing a nice chemistry with all three of her male co-stars, in particular, Paul Newman and Brandon de Wilde. As Lonnie in HUD, Brandon de Wilde exhibits a knowing, easy-going youthful appeal that is in sharp contrast to Hud's rough-edged, raw masculinity. As the youngest member of HUD's ensemble cast, he also had the skill to carve out a fine performance, holding his own with the other excellent cast members. An actor who unfortunately died too early for audiences to see more of his work, he is in great form in HUD. His scenes with Melvyn Douglas show a definite connection between the actors with their grandfather/grandson relationship, with Paul Newman a competitive/kindred bond, and a playful, nuanced connection with Patricia Neal.

Soundtrack: Elmer Bernstein's gentle guitar score perfectly enhances HUD, adding a solemn aura that is in keeping with the film's reflective, subtle nature. The movie features versions of the main score sparingly, with other naturalistic uses of music, such as Lonnie's radio, occurring within the film's diegetic world.

Mise-en-scene: The cinematography by James Wong Howe, as with the acting, is another unforgettable component of HUD. The barren nature of the landscapes, the streetscapes with their beautiful, stylized stores, for example, are captured in all their visual power by the talented Mr Howe. The widescreen photography is just as effective on the small screen, though the big screen is the place to appreciate the film in its supreme glory. The black and white photography works wonderfully, emphasizing the dusty nature of the land, as colour stock would have possibly made the film visually even more attractive, but less hard-hitting than in its monochrome perfection.

Award-worthy performances in my opinion: Paul Newman, Melvyn Douglas, Patricia Neal, Brandon de Wilde.

Suitability for young viewers: No. Adult themes.

Overall Grade: A

LinkIMDB Page

Trailer

Wednesday, June 10, 2020

THE REMOVALISTS (1975)


Title: THE REMOVALISTS

Year of Release: 1975

Director: Tom Jeffrey

Genre: Drama

Synopsis: A woman assists her sister in reporting an incident of domestic violence to the police who become involved in the case, with surprising but horrific results.

Within a film history context: Themes of domestic violence, and disintegrating marriages/unions, have appeared many times as an element in cinema over the years. One of the first documented films dealing with the issue was George Melford's silent film THE COST OF HATRED (1917). Starring Kathlyn Williams, it was about a woman who had an abusive husband, and her love affair with another man which led to consequences years later for her amour's son. Due to the Hays Code and its rules for filmmaking from the 1930s until the 1950s when it began to weaken, domestic violence did not appear much on film in only anything but its mutest form. One of the major exceptions was William Wellman's 1937 A STAR IS BORN. The first version of a story also filmed in 1954, 1976 and, most recently, in 2016, it centered around a fading Hollywood star who marries a woman who eclipses his fame, this causing tension in the marriage. Psychological in intention, and tragic in its ending, it is one of the most moving portrayals of domestic violence, the performances stellar. The 1950s, though, brought some of the most famous films which dealt with domestic violence. 

George Cukor's BORN YESTERDAY (1950) had the boorish, emotionally abusive Broderick Crawford verbally, and physically, taking out his anger on the vulnerable Judy Holliday. It was a film which deftly combined comedy and drama in a manner that has rarely been seen in cinema with the domestic violence theme. Daniel Mann's COME BACK LITTLE SHEBA (1952) was another variation on the theme. In this film, a young woman comes to live in the house of a drunkard and his wife, her arrival creating waves in what was already a shaky marriage. WRITTEN ON THE WIND (1956), directed by Douglas Sirk, had a small domestic violence component which was evident in the marriage of Kyle and Lucy Hadley, this largely marked by Kyle's drinking and insecurity. Moving into the 1960s and later, further portrayals of domestic violence and related themes were candid, and eye-opening for audiences at the time, still having power in the present age.

Mike Nichols' WHO'S AFRAID OF VIRGINIA WOOLF (1965), a watershed in censorship history for its language and themes, featured a couple who swapped verbal insults with abandon, this reflecting their tenuous marriage, and tumultuous relationship. It could be said that they abused each other in equal measure, something never before seen as it was usually one person being dominated by another within the filmic world. X, Y AND ZEE (1971), helmed by Brian G. Hutton, was similar to WHO'S AFRAID OF VIRGINIA WOOLF as it again starred Elizabeth Taylor in the role of the main female protagonist. This time around, though, she verbally throttled husband Michael Caine, driving him into the arms of another woman, and causing further untold misery within the course of the film. Francis Ford Coppola's THE GODFATHER (1972), within its expansive framework of themes, also touched upon domestic violence. Connie Corleone, Michael Corleone's sister, had an abusive husband who was swiftly dispatched in the film. In the case of THE REMOVALISTS, it shared some elements from the afore-mentioned films, but added original touches of its own to the theme of domestic abuse and verbal violence.

Unlike many of the films above, THE REMOVALISTS did not show the audience scenes where Marilyn was physically hurt by Kenny. Instead of this, the film displayed the scars which Kenny inflicted on Marilyn's body at the police station which carried an emotional impact on Marilyn, her body language and tiny voice the obvious signs of trauma. The movie, in terms of its victim Marilyn, was most similar to BORN YESTERDAY's Billie, with a loud male character drowning out her voice, but, this is where the affinities end. Unlike Billie, Marilyn is a wife and mother, and it appears that she harbors doubts as to whether she is doing the correct thing for herself by reporting her husband to the police. She also shared with Lucy from WRITTEN ON THE WIND in that she could not comprehend her husband's behaviour, and became somewhat withdrawn in the process.

What makes THE REMOVALISTS most striking, and diverts from the other films, is the role of the police in the domestic violence situation. This makes the film two-pronged, in that it is both an examination of a failing marriage but also, how police intervention may sometimes make a difficult situation only worse. The police take on the role of the vindicator of Marilyn's life in the film, but also, are the villain that they are not supposed to be. Their repeated thrashing of Kenny is shown as being justified due to Kenny's ongoing swearing and disrespect of women, but the film asks questions as to who exactly is the victim through the actions of the policemen, with Kenny's, and their own, fate resting in their hands. The relationship between Kenny, Neville and Dan ranges from sad to comical, fierce to sympathetic, which makes their interactions engrossing, and is symptomatic of the absorbing, beguiling nature of THE REMOVALISTS.

Overview: Tom Jeffrey was an Australian director of three motion pictures, also working on television series, and in the capacity of writer and producer of his own motion pictures, and those of others. His movies are brave, brutally honest examinations of aspects of both contemporary, and past Australian society. Despite only helming three movies, he had a varied and distinctive output. His second film, WEEKEND OF SHADOWS (1978), was set in 1930s Australia, and was concerned with the murder of a woman in a small town, and how a Polish man is accused of the crime, leading to violent repercussions. Mr Jeffrey's third and final film, ODD ANGRY SHOT (1979) was a film that detailed Australian soldiers' experiences while serving in Vietnam, done with candour, and containing many comic asides. THE REMOVALISTS, being Mr Jeffrey's directorial debut, shares the ability to relate to both sides of an issue that also exists in his other films, but deviates with its subject matter in this instance.

With THE REMOVALISTS, which is the film version of a play written by prolific Australian playwright David Williamson, Mr Jeffrey casts a light upon a situation, being how a supportive older sister assists her sibling in pressing charges against an abusive spouse, which results in the police becoming involved in this predicament. Mr Jeffrey tackles this issue in a detached manner, managing his actors to keep their emotions under control, which works in the film's favour as it unreels. The director takes time with the opening acts of the narrative, carefully arranging the characters in what would initially seem to be a simplistic premise peopled by stereotypes, and this bodes well for the film as a whole. 

Mr Jeffrey, over the course of the film, delves deeper into what is taking place, examining characters who may have, at first glance, seemed wafer-thin, by progressively peeling away the layers of pretense they were hiding behind. Truths emerge that may never have seen the light of day which cast a different perspective on the characters. Thus, the director provides a tense, cogent representation of a plight that may well have occurred at some time in life. This is the beauty of the film, shifting the view throughout as to who the villains are, but also, showing the emotional undercurrent that exists in their actions. While the film possesses these positive qualities, there are certain lapses without which it could have been even better.

There is a small incident where John Hargreaves' character, Neville Ross, refers to a certain part of the female anatomy in a vulgar term. This takes a little away from the film, making Ross not as squeaky clean as first thought, but it does not detract from Mr Hargreaves' excellent work as the hesitant, thoughtful Ross. Similarly, it would have been good to have known more about Chris Haywood's character, as he does wonders with his small part, and the character should have been connected even more to the main characters. This, though, points to another deficiency in THE REMOVALISTS. 

The film would have benefitted, for example, from additional scenes, such as more with Kenny and Marilyn, or flashbacks, to show what went wrong in their marriage. Short scenes would have made certain things about the characters even clearer for viewers, but staying faithful to a source play is understandable. It is a fine line in what to include and exclude in a film, but sometimes further clarification does not hurt the overall effect, only deepening viewer knowledge about the characters. Despite this, Tom Jeffrey should be commended for making THE REMOVALISTS a tight, compelling movie, that leaves the viewer uneasy but also, provides food for thought about humanity.

Acting: The performances of the actors in THE REMOVALISTS give the film an impetus and power that make it an exceptional viewing experience. As the head policeman at the station, Peter Cummins is excellent as the morally ambiguous but engaging Sergeant Dan Simmons. It is one of the most riveting representations of a corrupt, self-deceiving police officer ever filmed. He is matched by John Hargreaves as young Constable Neville Ross, Simmons' antithesis. It is interesting to note Mr Hargreaves' journey in the film from a rookie officer and his neophyte mistakes, to his final show of authority over Simmons. In contrast, Martin Harris offers a complex representation of the foul-mouthed, abusive Kenny. It is a credit to Mr Harris that he is able to mine sympathy out of such a resistible character, who, similar to Neville Ross, undergoes a transformation within the film's running time. The other actors also offer great performances in the film.

Kate Fitzpatrick projects an aura of steely determination as the upper-class Kate Mason, forthright sister of Marilyn Carter. What appears to be a prissy and uptight woman at the outset is made mesmerizing by Miss Fitzpatrick, and it is especially interesting to note her chemistry with Peter Cummins. Miss Fitzpatrick and Mr Cummins have an easy rapport in the film which makes their fieriest moments together both sad, and watchable. As people from opposite ends of the class spectrum, their clash is realistic. As Marilyn Carter, Kate's sister and Kenny's wife, Jacki Weaver brings her inimitable persona to the film, handling her character's predicament with a quiet but touching resignation. There are tender moments where she displays her sparkle, and these are featured in the introspective scenes where she remembers the best times of her marriage before it went awry.

Soundtrack: As with many films of the 1970s, THE REMOVALISTS has a spare soundtrack, mainly utilized during the opening and closing scenes, and the credits sequence. The piano and saxophone theme featured in the credits is suitably low-key, and in keeping with the film's assured pace, and ruminative outlook.

Mise-en-scene: The sets and location filming featured in THE REMOVALISTS are noteworthy of analysis for several reasons. At first glance, it would be easy to dismiss the mise-en-scene as being drab and colourless. The main settings, such as the police station, and the apartment of Marilyn and Kenny Carter, are hardly what would be considered glamorous, and, not intended to offer the audience pleasant eye candy. This, precisely, is why they function so well in the film. THE REMOVALISTS is down-to-earth in its execution, and this is also reflected in the sets. 

The backgrounds are functional in the way that they do not take away from the actors with their prettiness, which is what I presume the makers of the film intended. The film stock is not garish, but suitably understated, reflecting the humdrum lives of the characters. As THE REMOVALISTS is not a Technicolor extravaganza or musical, the subdued Eastmancolor cinematography works in the movie's favour. This is not to say that the viewer cannot see the action. The lighting allows for the characters to be observed properly, without shadows, which is also another very good technical aspect of the film. The film is to be applauded for its stark, naturalistic approach to mise-en-scene that could be said to have taken a leaf out of post-war film noir, or, Italian neo-realism of the 1940s and 1950s.

Award-worthy performances in my opinion: Peter Cummins, Kate Fitzpatrick, John Hargreaves, Jacki Weaver, Martin Harris.

Suitability for young viewers: No. Frequent coarse language, adult themes, medium-level violence.

Overall GradeB

LinkIMDB Page

Trailer


Tuesday, June 2, 2020

THE CAST OF JUD (1971) - WHERE ARE THEY NOW?

After recently watching the film JUD, and witnessing the performances of the actors in the movie, I was struck, and intrigued by the fact that many of the main performers either had a small list of acting credits, or just this film on their resumes. 


This prompted me to compose the following post, which I hope sheds light on these great actors, and what became of them. In saying this, I sincerely hope that they are well, and doing something they love in life, but, as a reviewer, it would have been great to have seen more work from them. I will start with lead actor Joseph Kaufmann. An actor who starred in a handful of films, he was perfect as the introspective, volatile Jud.


Robert Deman was also excellent as the sexually conflicted, photogenic Bill, who had an ingratiating, smooth charm.


Bonnie Bittner was a lovely, sensitive presence as Kathy, the only woman able to become close to Jud.


I also wonder what became of Alix Wyeth, the film's incarnation of a tigress. A woman of many passions and emotions, her Shirley was great to watch, a kind of movie version of daytime drama THE YOUNG AND THE RESTLESS' Jill Abbott.